Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the executing court could construe the decree under section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure and, on a true construction of the decree, whether the appellant managing director was personally liable so that his personal properties could be attached in execution.
Analysis: The decree did not disclose any pleaded foundation or judicial discussion establishing personal liability of the appellant in his individual capacity. A general recital that the defendants were jointly and severally liable was not conclusive by itself, and the executing court was entitled to construe the decree to ascertain its precise meaning within the limits of section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure. On the facts, the company was the contracting party and the materials showed no basis for fastening personal liability on the managing director merely by reason of his office. Directors are not personally liable for company debts unless some independent ground of personal liability is made out.
Conclusion: The appellant was not personally liable for the decretal dues and his personal properties could not be attached in execution. The executing court's view was correct and the contrary order was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: In execution, the court may construe the decree to determine its true import, and a managing director is not personally liable for company debts unless the decree and the pleadings disclose a specific basis for such liability.