Remand in connected import proceedings led to setting aside a penalty order and fresh adjudication together.

A penalty order based on alleged tampering of licence value was challenged before CEGAT. The Tribunal noted its disagreement with the view that 13 days' notice was insufficient, but considered that the importers' connected case had already been remanded for fresh adjudication. In those circumstances, it held that the present proceedings should not continue independently of the remand. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner to be heard together with the importers' case.

---

---

Issues: Whether the impugned order should be set aside and the matter remanded to the Commissioner for fresh adjudication along with the connected case of the importers.

Analysis: The appeals arose from a penalty order based on alleged tampering of licence value. Although the Tribunal noted its disagreement with the view that 13 days' notice was insufficient, it found that the importers' own case had already been remanded in connected proceedings and that it would be inappropriate to continue with the present proceedings independently of that remand.

Conclusion: The appeals were allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner for adjudication along with the importers' case.

---