https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101173 A penalty order based on alleged tampering of licence value was challenged before CEGAT. The Tribunal noted its disagreement with the view that 13 days' notice was insufficient, but considered that the importers' connected case had already been remanded for fresh adjudication. In those circumstances, it held that the present proceedings should not continue independently of the remand. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner to be heard together with the importers' case. en-us Tue, 02 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:56:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101173 A penalty order based on alleged tampering of licence value was challenged before CEGAT. The Tribunal noted its disagreement with the view that 13 days' notice was insufficient, but considered that the importers' connected case had already been remanded for fresh adjudication. In those circumstances, it held that the present proceedings should not continue independently of the remand. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Commissioner to be heard together with the importers' case. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 02 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=101173