Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the suspension of the Custom House Agent licence under Regulation 21(2) of the Custom House Agents Licensing Regulation, 1984 was sustainable in the absence of sufficient material and fair hearing.
Analysis: Regulation 21(2) permits immediate suspension only where the conduct complained of is of such seriousness that urgent action is justified. The power cannot be exercised mechanically or without a prima facie basis showing that continuation of the licence holder would be undesirable. The decision also emphasised that, even in such cases, minimal fairness requires an opportunity of hearing, and the absence of a show cause notice or hearing, coupled with the lack of adequate material supporting immediate suspension, rendered the action unsustainable.
Conclusion: The suspension was not sustainable and was set aside in favour of the appellant.
Final Conclusion: The order of immediate suspension could not stand because the statutory power was invoked without adequate basis and without observance of fair hearing requirements.
Ratio Decidendi: Exercise of the power of immediate suspension under Regulation 21(2) of the Custom House Agents Licensing Regulation, 1984 requires a prima facie justification supported by sufficient material and compliance with the minimum requirements of natural justice.