Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sales tax assessed against a firm could be recovered from the appellant without first determining whether, during the relevant assessment years, the partnership was subsisting and whether any taxable entity existed against whom liability could lawfully be enforced.
Analysis: The recovery notice proceeded on the footing that the appellant, having sold goods as authorised controller and having once been a partner, could be proceeded against for the firm's tax. The Court held that this approach was unsustainable because the appellant had not been assessed as authorised controller, and the mere fact that he had effected sales did not by itself establish personal liability for the firm's tax. Before enforcing liability on the basis that he was a former partner, it was necessary to determine whether the partnership agreement was in force and whether the firm continued as a subsisting partnership during the relevant years of assessment. That foundational question had not been examined.
Conclusion: The recovery proceedings against the appellant could not be sustained on the material considered, and the High Court's order was set aside with a direction to decide the petition afresh according to law.
Ratio Decidendi: Liability for tax assessed against a firm cannot be enforced against an individual without first determining the legally relevant taxable entity and the basis on which personal liability is said to arise.