Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Does threshold exemption really exist ?

KASTURI SETHI
Threshold exemption under GST effectively nullified by mandatory registration and reverse charge, burdening small businesses. The article argues that the statutory threshold exemption under GST is largely illusory because numerous categories (inter-state suppliers, casual taxable persons, reverse-charge supplies, electronic commerce operators, persons required to deduct or collect tax, voluntary registrants and Composition opt-ins) are compelled to register irrespective of turnover; the inclusion of exempt supplies in aggregate turnover and reverse charge obligations force many small suppliers into registration and tax compliance, while administrative and compliance costs further burden them. (AI Summary)

                             DOES  THRESHOLD EXEMPTION REALLY EXIST UNDER GST  ACT ?

     Answer is big “NO”. Threshold exemption of turnover of ₹ 20 lakhs is only in the name. Threshold exemption of ₹ 20 lakhs has been denied by Govt. by   attaching following strings  to  the businessmen :-

As per Section 24 of the CGST/SGST Act, the following categories of persons shall be required to be registered compulsorily irrespective of the threshold limit:

i) persons making any inter-State taxable supply;

ii) casual taxable persons;

iii) persons who are required to pay tax under reverse charge;

iv) electronic commerce operators required to pay tax under sub-section (5) of section 9;

v) non-resident taxable persons;

vi) persons who are required to deduct tax under section 51;

vii) persons who supply goods and/or services on behalf of other registered taxable persons whether as an agent or otherwise;

viii) Input service distributor (whether or not separately registered under the Act)

ix) persons who are required to collect tax under section 52;

x) every electronic commerce operator

xi) every person supplying online information and data base retrieval services from a place outside India to a person in India, other than a registered person; and,

             xii) such other person or class of persons as may be notified by the Central Government or a State Government on the recommendations of the Council.

           xiii)   any person who  has  turnover below  Rs.20 lakhs and obtains GST registration voluntarily as per FAQ released by Board on 28.6.2017. Vendors (Job workers)  are forced by the big companies to get registration and thus they would forfeit their threshold exemption which would result in payment of GST from Re one.

           xiv) any person who wants to opt for Composition Scheme has to get himself registered and has to pay GST from Re. one and thus forfeiting his threshold exemption.

         A businessman with turnover of ₹ 20 lakhs is a small business man whether he is a manufacturer or dealer or service provider. Virtually, Govt. has snatched  threshold exemption from small persons by imposing aforesaid conditions on them. It tantamounts to snatching fundamental right to live. These are the noiseless cries of small business which must be listened to by the Govt. In case the Govt. intends to woo the hearts of small businessmen, nay,  middle class families, Govt. must remove all the caps imposed upon them and enable them to avail threshold exemption like in  pre-GST period. A person with a turnover of 20  lakhs has to pay rent of premises, maintenance of premises, Income Tax and now GST and life is not restricted to the basic needs of Roti, Kapda Aur Makan. There are necessities like education and health expenses, savings for future etc. How far such meager threshold exemption with too much restrictions is justified ?  The very purpose of threshold exemption is defeated by  the aforesaid conditions imposed upon for availment threshold exemption. It has actually been denied. Such small businessmen  feels suffocated and hence aggrieved with such non-existent threshold exemption. Small Scale Industries and Small Service Providers have not been given relief by  way of  enhancing threshold exemption limit  for 10 years and 9 years respectively. It is evident from the following data:

   Year

Threshold  Exemption for manufacturer

Notifi.No.

& date

Threshold Exemption for Service Sector

Notifi. No.

& date

2003

1 crore

8/2003-CE dated 1.3.2003

4 lakhs

6/2005-ST dated 1.3.2005

2007

1.50 crores

8/2007-CE dated 1.3.2007

8 Lakhs

4/2007-ST dated 1.3.2007

2008

No increase

 

NIL

10 lakhs

8/2008-ST dated 1.3.2008

2009

No increase

NIL

No increase

NIL

2010

No increase

NIL

No increase

NIL

2011

No increase

NIL

No increase

NIL

2012

No increase

NIL

No increase

NIL

2013

No increase

NIL

No increase

NIL

2014

No increase

NIL

No increase

NIL

2015

No increase

NIL

No increase

NIL

2016

No increase

NIL

No increase

NIL

2017 (GST w.e.f. 1.7.17}

20 lakhs

 

20 lakhs

GST(w.e.f.1.7.17)

Now after a decade manufacturers, wholesale dealers, Retailers and Service Providers have been brought at par by way of allowing  threshold exemption limit of turnover of  just ₹ 20 lakhs each. Here it would be pertinent to analyse why any  Govt. did not increase threshold exemption for such a long period which was overdue. Rate of inflation may be the possible factor for non-increase of threshold exemption for a decade. So it is worthwhile to  have a look into the history of rates of inflation  existed  during last 15 years which are given in the table given below:

YEAR

RATE OF INFLATION BASED ON CPI

THRESHOLD EXEMPTION ALLOWED TO MANUFACTURER

THRESHOLD EXEMPTION  ALLOWED TO SERVICE  PROVIDER

PETROL PRICE PER LTR.

GOLD PRICE

International currency

 

2003

3.719

 1 Crore

NIL

31.00

5718.95

2004

3.785

 1 Crore

NIL

37.33

6145.38

2005

5.566

1 Crore

4 lakhs

39.99

6900.56

2006

6.529

 1 Crore

 4 lakhs

46.40

9240.32

2007

5.512

 1.5 crore

 8 lakhs

42.37

9995.62

2008

9.701

 1.5 Crore

10 lakhs

48.08

12889.74

2009

14.966

 1.5 Crore

10 lakhs

42.67

15756.09

2010

9.567

 1.5 Crore

10 lakhs

51.57

19227.08

2011

6.486

 1.5 Crore

10 lakhs

64.00

25048.00

2012

11.168

 1.5 Crore

10 lakhs

69.11

29569.00

2013

9.132

 1.5 Crore

10 lakhs

60.50

26148.00

2014

5.898

 1.5 Crore

10 lakhs

65.48

27524.00

2015

6.324

1.5 Crore

10 lakhs

61.52

26338.00

2016

2.230

1.5 Crore

10 lakhs

62.50

31811.00

2017

0.727

20 lakhs

20 lakhs

63.17

28146.00

    From a perusal of above, it can be deduced that Govt. has brought down threshold exemption to ₹ 20 lakhs from ₹ 1.50 crores on the basis of rate of inflation remained in 2016 and 2017. Though the rate of inflation remained at peak during  the years 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2012, yet threshold exemption limit was not increased at all. Thus it remained stagnant at ₹ 1.50 crores. The rate of inflation does not reflect true picture inasmuch as in real life prices of all items have increased five or six times. Thus SSI units have suffered a lot due to stagnant threshold limit for a decade. As per well-known Statisticians, statistical data does not indicate 100% accuracy. So the rate of inflation cannot be relied upon for all economic policies of Govt. Govt. cannot deny the sky rocketing prices of all commodities. The prices of gold, an international currency gives the true picture of sky rocketing prices of all the commodities as prices are influenced by international marketing forces.  Govt. has done gross injustice to all manufactures, dealers and service providers by fixing threshold exemption of just ₹ 20 lakhs each. Ultimately, repercussion will be on  poor and middle class families.

        Modvat facility was introduced in April, 1986 and thereafter it was called Cenvat Credit and Input Tax Credit. Even a period of three decades has lapsed, there is  a large number of dealers and service providers who do not  even know what is this credit facility and how they can get set-off. So all small manufacturers, dealers and  service providers will be forced to hire C.A.’s services and they cannot afford the high fee of CA’s. It is happening because of conditions imposed upon for denying them their right of threshold exemption.

              In case Govt. wants to woo the hearts of poor ( which constitute 23% of population)and middle class (which constitutes 50% of population in India)  families in the interest of nation, Govt. should lift all the pre-requisites imposed for availing small scale exemption  irrespective of the reasons foreseen behind this and enhance threshold exemption to ₹ 50 lakhs and Rs. One Crore for Composition Scheme respectively. SSI units, Small businessmen (dealers and Service Providers) deserve this relief.     

Keeping in view the record-breaking rising prices as well as  non-enhancement threshold exemption limit for a decade, now threshold exemption is suggested to be revised as under:-

(i)  For Manufacturers (SSI units) :  Rs.two crores

(ii) For dealers      :                        ₹ 50 lakhs

(iii) For Service Providers :             ₹ 30 lakhs

               Such increase is not unjustified by any amount of logic.

                                                                                                   

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
DR.MARIAPPAN GOVINDARAJAN on Jul 7, 2017

Welcome Sethi Sir to Articles Section. You have impressed on your first article itself.

KASTURI SETHI on Jul 7, 2017

Sir,

Thanks a lot. Really, you are my source of inspiration.

K.L.SETHI

NANDAKUMAR PANICKER on Jul 7, 2017

Nice article Sethi sab.

Moreover, it appears that in case of supply received from an unregistered person, whether he is falling under threshold exemption or not, to a registered person; he is liable to pay the tax under reverse charge. I am referring Section 9(4) of CGST. That means, the Govt. is still not losing the revenue in most of the cases. Please correct me if I am wrong.

KASTURI SETHI on Jul 7, 2017

Sh.Nand Kumar Panicker Ji,

Sir, I agree with you in toto. You are absolutely right. Thanks for liking and appreciating my article.It has boosted my moral.

K.L.SETHI

RAKESH R on Jul 8, 2017

Thanks Mr.Sethi Sir to bat for small scale business community.

I fully agree with you there is no threshold exemption because even if a registered person buys from an un-registered dealer he has to discharge GST under reverse charge. If 'X' turnover is below 20 lakhs he need not get registration and he is exempted from all compliance. However, it is proposed to collect the tax from buyer under reverse charge. This clearly shows that Government wants to tax all transaction.

The only remedy is if direct / ultimate consumer buys from the unregistered dealers, then no GST. Even in this transaction, the GST involved on the input tax credit is a cost to be borne by the ultimate consumer as no credit is eligible for the exempted seller.

KASTURI SETHI on Jul 8, 2017

SH. GOKARNESAN.S SUBRAMANIAN,

Sir, Thanks for your your appreciation and inspirational compliments.

Dr. Sanjiv Agarwal on Jul 8, 2017

Nice piece indeed. . Congratulations

Guest on Jul 8, 2017

Makes for an interesting read; for that matter, in one's longstanding form conviction, in the ultimate analysis, any such threshold for 'exemption' is highly arbitrary, founded/stemmed on a dubious idea, - being a 'rule of thumb', arbitrarily fixed by bureaucracy,with no sanctity attached !

Universally so, not merely in taxation regimes, but in every other- e.g. KAR rules, pending notification, under RERA - see the separate post of y'day !

NOTE: It is time now; what needs but remains to be realised , going by wisdom to be gathered from past experience, is that, - it is any such arbitrarily fixed threshold, with no rhyme or reason, that accounts for most of the manipulations indulged in , by vested interests, and having the inevitable potential for corruption, top to bottom,

Guest on Jul 8, 2017

To Add: Reference is to the Post on Facebook, of y'day - sub: KAR. rules under RERA !

BALAJEE K S on Jul 8, 2017

A very good analysis and thanks to you for highlighting. Based on all economic indices it is only apt to increase the threshold limit for any manufacturer, dealer or service provider to more than ₹ 20 lakhs. You very well said at least ₹ 30 lakhs should be fixed, may be, without attaching any strings or conditions. If the dealer or service provider wants to avail ITC or other benefit let him decide. Moreover by applying the same logic and actual economic conditions the basic exemption limit for taxable income under the Income-tax Act should also be raised to at least ₹ 4 lakhs. The recent changes in GST or demonetisation or Income tax have not improved the lot of common man, i.e., lower or middle income class. They are still a suffering and are suffocated to a large extent by the recent phenomenal increase in the day-to-day prices of commodities and that too price increase effected by the traders due to new GST with respect to hotels, food products, sand, construction materials etc.

BALAJEE K S on Jul 8, 2017

Good Article and analysis. Thank you so much Sir

KASTURI SETHI on Jul 8, 2017

I am thankful to Dr.Sanjiv Agarwal, Sh.Baalajee K.S., Sh.Swaminathan Venkat Raman for liking my article.

K.L.SETHI

PMR Gowrissankar on Jul 8, 2017

Sihey cannot collect GSTr, indedd you have analysed the problem of assessees not knowing about existing taxes as they are not coming under tax net. In addition to above, my assessee which is a trust having income of 15 lakhs donation and rent from commercial buildings of ₹ 9 lakhs per annum who is adviced to take GST as the turnover exceeds 20 lakhs. What is the remedy for them as they could not collect GST from teneants who are all small traders?

KASTURI SETHI on Jul 8, 2017

Dear Sir,

Whether Trust registered under Section 12 AA of Income Tax Act ?

Guest on Jul 9, 2017
Vinay Kunte on Jul 9, 2017

Sir

A very bold and correct analysis of the so called exemption limit set by GSt Council. It appears that the limit is set only for the retailers who would not be forced by their customers to take registrations to avoid hassels fo reversed charge mechanism for receiving supplied from URD and would easily do the tarse using verious names of business verticals under same PAN just as they could do under VAT and avoid payment of Tax but for those who supply goods to other registered persons, it is a necessicity to get register to continue the business w/o loosing custmers.

The clause of payment of GSt under RCM for suplied received from URD must be revoked and it should be left to the business entity to decide whether to pay under RCm and avail ITC or go for cost addition to goods supplied.

The Associates of the Trade and Tax consultants must strongly put this across to governmwnt and to GST Council.

KASTURI SETHI on Jul 9, 2017

Sh. Vinay Kunte Ji,

Sir, Thrilled to peruse your comments and analytical approach. Thanks for your contribution on the issue.

Ashok Aggarwal on Jul 9, 2017

Very nicely analysed article. Earlier small service providers were encouraged by companies because they were exempted and no tax was payable by recipient of service also. Now they will not get clients as the tax will have to be paid under reverse charge mechanism.

Moreover the casual tax payer is not exempted and hence practically nobody would be exempted.

Regards

KASTURI SETHI on Jul 9, 2017

Sh.PMR Gowrissankar Ji,

Sir,

Section 2(6) of CGST Act defines

(6) “aggregate turnover” means the aggregate value of all taxable supplies (excluding the value of inward supplies on which tax is payable by a person on reverse charge basis), exempt supplies, exports of goods or services or both and inter-State supplies of persons having the same Permanent Account Number, to be computed on all India basis but excludes central tax, State tax, Union territory tax, integrated tax and cess;

Exempt supplies are also to be included into aggregate turnover to arrive at threshold exemption limit.

Treat the amount as cum-tax.

KASTURI SETHI on Jul 10, 2017

Sh.PMR GOWRISSANKAR JI,

Sir,

Will you please let me know what is the basis of your comments mentioned below ?

"indeed you have analysed the problem of assessees not knowing about existing taxes as they are not coming under tax net".

Just for enrichment of my knowledge.

Thanks & Regards.

K.L.SETHI

+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles