Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
Sort By:
Relevance Date

Non-filing of ITR may lead to prosecution… Incase of wilful evasion

Vivek Jalan
Skipping returns or TDS? How Sections 276C, 278E and 276B make tax evasion a jail term Non-filing of income tax returns and non-payment of tax can attract prosecution under Section 276C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for willful evasion of tax, penalty, or interest, or under-reporting of income. Rigorous imprisonment ranges from 6 months to 7 years with fine where evasion exceeds Rs. 25 lakhs, and 3 months to 2 years with fine otherwise. Willful evasion involves false or omitted accounting entries and must be intentional, though under Section 278E the burden shifts to the assessee to prove absence of culpable intent. In contrast, failure to deposit deducted TDS under Section 276B is punishable even without proving willfulness. (AI Summary)

Non-Filing of ITR and non-payment of taxes can cause prosecution u/s Section 276 C which provides that a person who willfully attempts to evade tax, penalty, or interest under the Income Tax Act, 1961, or under-reports income, may be subject to rigorous imprisonment and fines. If the amount evaded or tax on under-reported income exceeds Rs.25 Lakhs, imprisonment ranges from 6 months – 7 years with a fine; otherwise, imprisonment ranges from 3 months – 2 years with a fine.

Wilful evasion includes possession or control of false accounting records, making false entries, omitting relevant entries, or causing circumstances enabling tax evasion. The court may impose fines at its discretion. These provisions apply without prejudice to other penalties under the Act.

As per the provisions of Income Tax Act, there is difference between “willful evasion” and “failure” to pay tax. There are certain kinds of tax which if not paid then that itself is sufficient to attract penal provisions of Income Tax Act. Eg. TDS, whereas in case of ‘willful evasion’, there must be averment that the assessee deliberately and intentionally attempted to evade the tax and it must be substantiated. However, as per the provisions of 278 E ‘relating to presumption as to culpable State’ - the burden lies on assessee to establish that failure was not on account of willful intension.

Now, in hindsight it needs to be seen that Section 276-B will be applicable when the tax deducted at source is not credited to Government. This is one of the contingency. ‘Failure to credit’ itself is sufficient. It need not be willful. Because once you have deducted a tax from the income of other person (who is liable), such person is bound to credit it. That omission itself is an offence without addition of willfulness / intension; but the legislatures have cautiously used the word ‘willful evasion’ in Section 276-C of the Income Tax Act. It indicates there maybe cases wherein there is a genuine case for not paying tax on or before the due date even though return is submitted.

Incase a failure cannot be considered as a willful evasion. Such cases will be outside the clutches of Section 276-C of the Income Tax Act as was held in the case of Vilas Babanrao Kalokhe Versus Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) Pune, The Asst. /Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle – 2 (1), Pune, Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Range – 2, Pune, State of Maharashtra, Union of India. - 2025 (10) TMI 958 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT.

Hence taxpayers who disclose in their ITRs specifically tax payable, need to be very sure that they have paid such taxes. A lapse may land them into deep trouble.

answers
Sort by
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
+ Add A New Reply
Hide
Recent Articles