Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
+ Post an Article
Post a New Article
Title :
0/200 char
Description :
Max 0 char
Category :
Co Author :

In case of Co-Author, You may provide Username as per TMI records

Delete Reply

Are you sure you want to delete your reply beginning with '' ?

Delete Issue

Are you sure you want to delete your Issue titled: '' ?

Articles

Back

All Articles

Advanced Search
Reset Filters
Search By:
Search by Text :
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms
Select Date:
FromTo
Category :
- 0 - Views

GST Authority cannot block the bank accounts or ECL beyond an year if assesse is cooperating

Date 31 Jan 2022
Written By
Revenue Department must unblock accounts if assessees cooperate, per Rule 86A(3) & Section 83(2) CGST Act.
The Delhi High Court ruled that if an assessee cooperates with the Revenue Department and submits necessary documents, their bank accounts and Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL) cannot remain blocked beyond one year. In the case involving a petitioner challenging the Revenue Department's order to block their bank account and ECL, the court observed that the petitioner had cooperated with the investigation. Consequently, the court directed the Revenue Department to unblock the bank account and ECL within three working days, as per Rule 86A(3) of the CGST Rules and Section 83(2) of the CGST Act, which limit such restrictions to one year. - (AI Summary)

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in M/S. KRISHNA FASHION VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.  [2022 (1) TMI 853 - DELHI HIGH COURT] held that once the assessee is cooperating and has submitted the relevant documents to the Revenue Department then the bank accounts and Electronic Credit Ledger ("ECL”) of such assessee to be unblocked upon the expiry of one year from the date of imposing such restrictions.

Facts:

M/s Krishna Fashion (“the Petitioner”) filed this present writ petition before the Delhi High Court challenging the order dated March 16, 2020 ("Impugned order”) passed by the Revenue Department (“the Respondents”) stating that the Respondents have attached the Petitioner’s bank account maintained in Union Bank of India and blocked the ECL.

The Petitioner contented that as per the Rule 86A(3) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (“the CGST Rules”) the ECL was supposed to be unblocked on February 05, 2021 upon completion of one year from the date of imposing such restrictions. However, it continued to remain the same.

Also, as per the Section 83(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”) the Impugned order will stand invalid upon completion of one year from the date of passing such order.

The Respondents argued that there were no new GST DRC-22 (i.e., Provisional attachment of property under Section 83 of the CGST Act) issued in this matter, the Petitioner has not appeared before the Investigating Officer despite of the service of the summons and not even produced the relevant documents.

Issue:

Whether the Respondent has the power to keep the bank account and the ECL blocked under Section 83(2) of the CGST Act and Rule 86A(3) CGST Rules beyond one year?

Held:

The Hon’ble Delhi High Court in M/S. KRISHNA FASHION VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS.  [2022 (1) TMI 853 - DELHI HIGH COURT] held as under:

  • Observed that the Petitioner has cooperated with the investigating agencies and will continue to appear before the Investigating Authorities as and when required along with the relevant documents.
  • Directed the Respondents to de-freeze the bank account of the Petitioner maintained with M/S Union Bank of India as well as unblock the ECL within three working days of uploading the present order.

Relevant Provisions:

Section 83(2) of the CGST Act

“83. Provisional attachment to protect revenue in certain cases

(2) Every such provisional attachment shall cease to have effect after the expiry of a period of one year from the date of the order made under sub-section.”

Rule 86A(3) of the CGST Rules

“86A. Conditions of use of amount available in electronic credit ledger: -

(3) Such restriction shall cease to have effect after the expiry of a period of one year from the date of imposing such restriction.”

(Author can be reached at info@a2ztaxcorp.com)

0 answers
Sort by

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Hide

No Replies are present for this Article

Recent Articles