Transfer pricing thresholds revised to restrict option where pricing variation exceeds notified limit and curb retrospective adjustments. Amendments to section 92C impose a maximum notified percentage cap for a proviso in sub section (2) and clarify that the second proviso applies to assessment or reassessment proceedings pending before the Assessing Officer as of a prior date. Sub section (2A) disqualifies an assessee from using the earlier option where the variation between the arithmetical mean and actual transaction price exceeds a specified threshold. Sub section (2B) restricts the Assessing Officer from using sub section (2A) to open or enhance liability for assessment years with proceedings completed before the stated retrospective date.
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Transfer pricing thresholds revised to restrict option where pricing variation exceeds notified limit and curb retrospective adjustments.
Amendments to section 92C impose a maximum notified percentage cap for a proviso in sub section (2) and clarify that the second proviso applies to assessment or reassessment proceedings pending before the Assessing Officer as of a prior date. Sub section (2A) disqualifies an assessee from using the earlier option where the variation between the arithmetical mean and actual transaction price exceeds a specified threshold. Sub section (2B) restricts the Assessing Officer from using sub section (2A) to open or enhance liability for assessment years with proceedings completed before the stated retrospective date.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.