I am an advocate on roll with the Karnataka State Bar Council and have over three years of experience as a tax lawyer and consultant specializing in Indirect Tax law, particularly GST law.
Previously, I was employed at one of the Big 5 audit, tax, and advisory services firm. Currently, I am associated with a tier-one law firm in the country. My expertise lies in providing comprehensive advisory services, litigation support, compliance assistance, and conduct thorough due diligence for clients from diverse sectors.
Find me on LinkedIn - https://www.linkedin.com/in/neha-dayananda/
Any articles, views, and comments published by me on this platform are made in my personal capacity. I do not represent or publish anything on behalf of any organization.
No issues posted by the user yet!
No replies have been made yet!
Showing 1 to 1 of 1 Results
Input Tax Credit eligibility should be assessed per transaction to trigger deeming of invoice value under valuation rules.
Interpretation of eligible for full Input Tax Credit (ITC) in the provisos to Rule 28 turns on whether eligibility is assessed per transaction or for the recipient overall. Rule 28 sets valuation methods between related persons and includes provisos deeming invoice value as market or guarantee value where the recipient is eligible for full ITC. Given that ITC entitlement and reversal rules operate transactionally and Rule 28 addresses valuation by transaction, the provisos should be read to require transaction-level ITC eligibility for the deeming provision to apply, and administrative clarification is desirable. (AI Summary)
Goods and Services Tax - GST