Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
Profile

About Section not updated!

0 Records Found

No issues posted by the user yet!

0 Replies on 0 Issues

No replies have been made yet!

Showing 1 to 2 of 2 Results
Like0Bookmark
Fraudulent Input Tax Credit: beneficiaries and facilitators now face penalties equivalent to tax evaded under amended GST rules.
Finance Act, 2020 amends GST law to (i) update the definition of union territory, (ii) narrow composition scheme eligibility to exclude certain services and inter State supplies, (iii) delink debit note timing from underlying invoices for input tax credit claim, (iv) prescribe retrospective power to set time and manner for transitional credits, (v) strengthen penalty and criminal provisions to hold beneficiaries and facilitators liable for fraudulent invoices and wrongful ITC, and (vi) empower jurisdictional commissioners and extend removal of difficulties order period. (AI Summary)
Date 07 Jul 2020
Replies 6 Replies
Like0Bookmark
Transitional input tax credit: retrospective insertion of time limits into Section 140 challenges judicial grants of belated TRAN-1 claims.
The note analyses conflict between judicial rulings treating accumulated CENVAT/ITC as a vested property interest and Rule 117 time limits for filing TRAN-1 under Section 140, and the Finance Act, 2020 retrospective insertion of "within such time and" into Section 140 to validate rule-prescribed time bars. It highlights broad judicial definitions of "technical difficulty" that permitted extensions and manual filings, surveys constitutional limits on retrospective amendments, and sets out implications for taxpayers to preserve claims and pursue remedies given the amendment's potential to negate earlier favorable orders. (AI Summary)
Date 08 Jun 2020
Replies 2 Replies
CA AANCHAL KAPOOR
Organization
Organization

AANCHAL KAPOOR AND ASSOCIATES

Connected
Connected

June 2020