Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
Profile

We are a firm of lawyers specialising in Income Tax Appellate matters.

0 Records Found

No issues posted by the user yet!

1 Reply on 0 Issues

No replies have been made yet!

Showing 1 to 2 of 2 Results
Like0Bookmark
Estimation of on money: authorities may adjust consideration only when specific corroborated evidence shows undisclosed payments.
Revenue practice of extrapolating higher observed prices to estimate undeclared payments termed on money conflicts with the statutory role of stamp duty valuation as fair market value. Courts permit additions where specific, corroborated evidence or admissions establish receipt of extra payments for particular units, but have disallowed blanket estimation across other units lacking direct evidence, noting each sale is an independent contract with unit-specific value determinants. Absent cogent material, taxing notional income instead of real income is impermissible. (AI Summary)
Date 27 Jan 2017
Replies 1 Reply
Like0Bookmark
Validity of search authorisation: appellate review may verify warrant existence but not re-evaluate the issuing officer's subjective satisfaction.
Challenge to a search under section 132 focuses on whether appellate review of an assessment under section 153A may encompass adjudication of the existence and legality of the warrant and the statutory conditions for issuance. Authorities converge that appellate bodies must verify existence of a warrant in the appellant's name, diverge on whether they may examine objectively the grounds for issuance, and uniformly regard assessment of the issuing officer's subjective satisfaction as generally non-justiciable. (AI Summary)
Date 06 Jul 2016
Replies 1 Reply
Bharat Agarwal
Organization
Organization

Acelegal

Connected
Connected

July 2009