Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
Profile

About Section not updated!

0 Records Found

No issues posted by the user yet!

0 Replies on 0 Issues

No replies have been made yet!

Showing 1 to 3 of 3 Results
Like0Bookmark
Applicable service tax rate: clash between rate fixed at time of provision and rate tied to invoice or payment timing.
A statutory provision fixes the applicable service tax rate as the rate in force when a service is provided or agreed to be provided, while the Point of Taxation Rules determine when a service is deemed provided and often apply the changed rate based on invoice issuance or payment timing; the deletion of a rule cross referencing rate timing has produced a conflict between statutory rate timing and rule based invoice/payment timing, generating ambiguity that requires administrative clarification. (AI Summary)
Date 22 May 2015
Replies 2 Replies
Like0Bookmark
Service tax on restaurant services faces constitutional challenge over whether supply of food is sale or taxable service.
Constitutional validity of service tax on restaurant supplies depends on whether Article 366(29A)(f) deems the supply of food and drink at restaurants to be a sale of goods, precluding central taxation of associated services. Kerala High Court treated the entire restaurant activity as sale; Mumbai High Court distinguished outdoor catering from restaurant supply and upheld that the deeming clause permits state VAT on food supply without negating Parliament's power to tax services. Supreme Court precedents differentiate hotel accommodation and outdoor catering, directing segregation of supply and service components. (AI Summary)
Date 18 Nov 2014
Like0Bookmark
Exemption ambiguity in auxiliary education services risks taxing student facing services contrary to intent, needing regulatory clarification.
Amendment narrowing the exemption to services "to" educational institutions has produced an apparent drafting anomaly: while the intent was to withdraw exemption only for renting of immovable property by institutions to outsiders, the amended wording excludes auxiliary services provided by institutions to students. The bundled services doctrine preserves exemption for auxiliary activities naturally integrated with recognized education, and passenger transport provided by institutions fits the contract carriage transport exemption, but overall ambiguity warrants regulatory clarification. (AI Summary)
Date 16 Sep 2013
Manindar Kakarla
Organization
Organization

Manindar & Associates

Connected
Connected

April 2009