Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme settlement certificates are conclusive only for tax arrears expressly covered by them. An interest-only certificate for Assessment Year 1993-94 did not bar a refund arising when a brought-forward loss was later set off, because no income-tax demand had been settled. Conversely, for Assessment Year 1995-96, the certificate expressly settled both income tax and interest; a refund based on a later loss set-off would reduce the settled tax demand and was therefore barred. Statutory finality prevents reassessment or refund only to the extent it reopens matters specifically settled under the Scheme.

CHHATTISGARH ORDINANCE (No. 4 of 2019) THE CHHATTISGARH GOODS AND SERVICES TAX (AMENDMENT) ORDINANCE, 2019 An Ordinance further to amend the Chhattisgarh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (No. 7 of 2017). Promulgated by the Governor of Chhattisgarh, in the Seventieth Year of the Republic of India. Whereas, the State Legislature is not in session and the Governor of Chhattisgarh is satisfied that, the circumstances exist, which render it necessary for him to take immediate action... ... ...

MINISTRY OF FINANCE (Department of Revenue) (THE CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS) NOTIFICATION NO. 74/2026-CUSTOMS (N.T.) New Delhi, the 1st September, 2026 S.O. 4840(E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4, read with section 3 and sub sections (1) and (1A) of section 5 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, hereby appoints officer mentioned in column (4) of the Table below to exercise th... ... ...

SHRI B.R. BASKARAN (AM) AND SHRI NARENDER KUMAR CHOUDHRY (JM) For the Assessee : Shri Karan Jain For the Department : ShriPrakash Kishinchandani ORDER Per B.R.Baskaran (AM) :- The assessee has filed this appeal challenging the order dated 28.11.2022 passed by the learned CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi and it relates to A.Y. 2011-12. The assessee is aggrieved by the decision of the learned CIT(A) in confirming the (a) addition of long term capital gains mad... ... ...

Reverse charge mechanism for fuel-inclusive passenger motor-vehicle rental services applies where a non-body-corporate supplier provides the service to a body corporate and does not issue an invoice charging GST at 12%. Where GST at 12% is charged by the supplier, the body corporate has no reverse-charge liability. A supplier covered by reverse charge must not charge tax from the recipient. The framework is clarificatory and also governs the period from 1 October 2019 to 30 December 2019.

Omission of rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules, 2017, without an accompanying saving clause, applies to proceedings pending on the date of omission. The restrictions previously contained in that sub-rule cannot be enforced in such pending matters. Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 does not preserve pending proceedings following omission of a rule. Continuance requires an express saving provision or another legal mechanism preserving existing rights and proceedings.

Commencement of the West Bengal Finance Act, 2026 is staggered. Section 1 and specified parts of section 2 took effect immediately upon notification of the Act. Sub-section (1), clause (a) of sub-section (2), and sub-section (4) of section 2 take effect from 1 October 2026. Scheduled provisions notified under clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 2 are to commence on separately appointed dates.

Government of Bihar Commercial Taxes Department File No.- Bikri-kar/Vividh-28/2018 1766 Dated- 23.09.2020 From: Dr. Pratima, Commissioner State Tax-cum-Secretary, Bihar, Patna. To. All Additional Commissioner, All Circle Incharge, Bihar. Subject: Clarification in respect of levy of GST on Director's remuneration - Reg. Ref: CBIC Circular No. 140/10/2020- GST dated 10.06.2020 Various queries have been raised from tr... ... ...

Due service of tax notices requires recorded particulars of the recipient and serving officer, use of the latest registered address, and a sequential process of registered post followed by affixation where service remains unsuccessful. Service following partition, dissolution, or business discontinuance must be made on the specified former responsible person, partner, member, or principal officer. Ex parte orders must record the service status of earlier notices, and assessment orders must be speaking orders explaining reasons for allowing or disallowing input tax.

Sea Cargo Manifest and Transshipment (Third Amendment) Regulations, 2026 replace the entry in column (3) against serial number 6 in the Table after Form XII with "31.10.2026". The substituted date becomes the prescribed entry for that table position. The amendment takes effect upon publication in the Official Gazette.

Early foreign-exchange trading saw the rupee weaken against the US dollar amid renewed US-Iran tensions, risk aversion, higher Brent crude prices, and a stronger dollar. Safe-haven demand, inflation concerns linked to potential oil-supply disruption, expectations of a September Federal Reserve rate increase, and higher US Treasury yields supported the broad dollar rally. RBI monitoring of the rupee's decline was noted.

Responsible artificial intelligence governance requires continuous innovation, inclusive development, responsible deployment and trust-based governance. AI systems should be ethical, safe, transparent, fair and human-centric, with safeguards for privacy, bias, security and accountability. Proportionate and adaptive regulation should provide clear accountability, standards, monitoring, auditability and grievance redressal. Good governance, cybersecurity, personal data protection and responsible AI together strengthen organisational resilience, stakeholder trust, transparency and sustainable innovation.

National Land Monetization Corporation will facilitate the e-auction and outright sale of 459 encumbrance-free RINL land parcels, including residential plots and parcels suited for commercial and logistics use. Competitive bidding will occur through the RailTel E-Nivida e-procurement platform. Participation requires online registration, KYC verification, and plot-wise submission of an earnest money deposit within prescribed timelines. The process supports transparent monetisation of surplus land and non-core public assets.

Competition Commission of India approval applies to the acquisition of Aseem Infrastructure Finance Limited by TPG Nicobar SG Pte. Ltd., a subsequent minority share acquisition by ICICI Bank Limited, and Aseem's divestment of its shareholding in NIIF Infrastructure Finance Limited to National Investment and Infrastructure Fund II. Following the acquisition, Climate Finance India Private Limited is intended to merge into Aseem as the surviving entity. The entities involved include RBI-registered non-deposit taking NBFCs operating in infrastructure finance, investment and credit, and infrastructure debt financing.

Competition Commission approval covers KCIL's acquisition of up to 100% equity shareholding in AFCPL and 100% equity shareholding in ASHPL. The combination includes KCIL issuing equity shares and optionally convertible debentures to AHLL, representing 9.9% fully diluted shareholding as partial consideration, together with a further KCIL equity investment by Arvon Investments Pte. Ltd. KCIL operates mother and baby care hospitals, while AFCPL provides assisted reproductive treatment and reproductive-medicine services.

Section 112(2) gives the Appellate Tribunal discretion to refuse admission of small-value GST appeals, reducing avoidable litigation. Taxpayers considering low-value second appeals should assess admission risk, litigation cost, recurring issues and the strength of their grounds. Departmental appeals remain governed by monetary limits that operate as general guidelines, subject to exceptions for recurring issues, classification, refunds and other specified matters. Tax officials should apply these limits consistently to prevent repetitive and low-value litigation.

Nil turnover in GST returns does not by itself establish discontinuance of business or justify cancellation of registration. Cancellation under Section 29 requires an actual statutory ground and the Proper Officer's independent satisfaction based on the real factual position. Return data may trigger scrutiny, but cannot replace verification, cogent and tangible evidence, and a factual finding that business has ceased. Documents already submitted in revocation proceedings must be considered, and procedural default cannot prove substantive discontinuance. Nil turnover may invite verification, not automatic cancellation.

Electronic movement between SEZ locations and Customs Bonded Warehouses requires matched physical movement and ledger debit-credit entries. SEZ-to-Warehouse movement uses a W-type Bill of Entry, linked Z-type Bill of Entry details, warehouse code, bond debit on assessment and Warehouse Ledger credit after out-of-charge. Warehouse-to-SEZ movement uses a Z-type Bill of Entry, linked W-type Bill of Entry details, Warehouse Ledger debit, SEZ Bond debit, an Ex-Bond Shipping Bill, let export order, SEZ receipt and goods registration before SEZ Ledger credit. No IGM particulars or duty payment apply under the stated procedure.

Vicarious liability under the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 depends on whether a former officer was in charge of and responsible for the company's relevant day-to-day business when the contravention occurred. Designation alone is insufficient; actual functions, control, authority, and involvement in export and recovery operations must be established. Delegated authority to sign export-related and banking documents may indicate responsibility. Technical or procedural non-compliance concerning realisation of export proceeds may attract compliance consequences without proof of a particular mental state.

Extended limitation is an exceptional jurisdiction, not an additional period available after normal limitation expires. A tax discrepancy or possible taxability does not establish fraud, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts, or intent to evade tax. The show cause notice must set out the factual and legal basis for both classification and extended limitation, including the specific statutory limb invoked and material supporting culpable conduct. Audit observations, return mismatches, or protective proceedings cannot replace these foundational facts.