Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Credits Reduced 🎉

• AI Advanced Search
4 Credits3 Credits
• Drafter – Issue Extraction
25 Credits20 Credits
• Draft Generation / Issue
50 Credits25 Credits

Enjoy more AI usage with fewer credits! Get up to 50% more value from your AI Credits.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
Filter Across TMI
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • DTAA
  • Benami Property
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • SION
  • SEZ
  • FEMA
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI
  • IBC
  • Law of Competition
  • LLP
  • Partnership Firms
  • Trust and Society
  • Money Laundering
  • Labour laws
  • Bharatiya Nyaya
  • Indian Laws
  • F. Acts / Amendment Acts
  • Bills
  • Wealth-tax
  • Service Tax
  • Cenvat Credit
  • Central Excise
  • Central Sales Tax
  • VAT - Delhi
Category:
---- All Categories ----
  • ---- All Categories ----
  • Case Laws
  • Acts / Rules
  • Notifications
  • Circulars
  • Forms - Annexure
  • Tariff / Classification
  • Duty Drawback
  • Schedules / SION
  • Discussion Forum
  • Highlights
  • Articles
  • Manuals / Reckoners
  • News / Feed
  • Short Notes
  • TMI Info
From Date:
To Date:
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Search Across Website
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries
2026 (8) TMI 1317
Case Laws Customs
Roasted nut classification under Heading 2008 applies, while advance rulings are barred on court-decided identical questions.
Advance rulings cannot be issued where an identical classification question has already been decided by a court; accordingly, the request concerning roasted areca nuts was barred under the Customs Act. Roasted walnuts, having undergone high-temperature roasting that alters their flavour, colour and texture for immediate consumption, fall within the specific tariff coverage for dry-roasted or fat-roasted nuts under Heading 2008 rather than Chapter 8 for fresh or dried nuts. Concessional customs duty is available only where the importer strictly establishes compliance with the applicable notification and prescribed country-of-origin requirements to the competent customs officer's satisfaction.

2026 (8) TMI 1318
Case Laws Customs
Veterinary therapeutic APIs qualify as drugs under the specific concessional IGST entry despite classification within a general chemical chapter.
Veterinary active pharmaceutical ingredients with established therapeutic use, including Clopidol (VET) and Amprolium 100% (VET), fall within the inclusive statutory meaning of drugs because it covers animal medicines and substances used as drug components. The specific IGST rate entry for all drugs and medicines is description-based, applies to goods classified under Chapter 30 or other chapters, and is not limited to finished dosage forms. It therefore takes precedence over the general organic-chemical entry for such veterinary APIs. The products qualify for the concessional IGST rate, provided they are not covered by the separate nil-rate entry for specified drugs.

2026 (8) TMI 1319
Case Laws Customs
Roasted walnut classification follows the specific tariff entry, while preferential customs duty depends on satisfactory proof of origin.
Roasted walnuts fall under Tariff Item 2008 19 91 as other roasted nuts and seeds because roasting is a high-heat process distinct from drying and is not among the processes covered by Chapter 8. Classification follows Rule 1 of the General Rules for Interpretation, the relevant tariff headings and notes, supported by HSN Explanatory Notes and trade understanding. Preferential basic customs-duty treatment under the notified ASEAN-India arrangement is available only where the importer satisfactorily establishes that the goods originate in the relevant notified country under the applicable origin rules and the Customs Rules of Origin framework.

2026 (8) TMI 1320
Case Laws Customs
Customs transaction value remains valid where unauthenticated export documents and uncorroborated statements do not establish undervaluation.
Declared transaction value for imported cigarettes cannot be rejected or enhanced merely on unauthenticated certificates of origin and purported export shipping bills. A valid overseas supply contract supported the declared value, while no evidence established additional payment, misclassification, or higher-priced comparable imports. The certificate was neither used for preferential treatment nor officially verified, and third-party shipping bills were not shown to be authentic or to reflect the true import price. Uncorroborated statements acknowledging those documents were insufficient without admissible supporting evidence. In the absence of reliable contemporaneous import evidence or cogent valuation material, the undervaluation allegation fails.

2026 (8) TMI 1321
Case Laws Customs
Knowledge of offending imported goods is essential for enhanced customs penalty; improper storage instead attracts residual liability.
Penalty under Section 112(b) requires proof that the person knew the imported goods were offending goods. Uncorroborated customs broker statements, a non-inculpatory statement by the person penalised, and the absence of evidence from the person seeking temporary storage did not establish that knowledge. Although the imported goods were stored other than at the designated place without informing customs authorities, that breach did not satisfy the knowledge requirement for Section 112(b). The conduct instead attracted the residual penalty under Section 117 for failure to comply with storage-related customs requirements.

2026 (8) TMI 1322
Case Laws Customs
Preferential origin verification requires certificate-specific inquiry; general allegations cannot justify denial of customs-duty benefits or consequential penalties.
Preferential customs-duty benefits require Customs to follow the prescribed verification process before rejecting a Certificate of Origin. Where Customs doubts a certificate, it must communicate the grounds to the issuing authority and obtain clarification through specific, time-bound verification. General communications concerning other certificates or importers do not establish that an importer's certificate is non-authentic. Documentary certificates cannot be displaced by assumptions about a supplier's business profile, unverified electronic communications, or third-party statements. Retracted and uncorroborated statements, particularly where not tested through examination and cross-examination, cannot substitute for verification. Failure to undertake certificate-specific verification renders denial of preferential duty and consequential recovery, confiscation, fine and penalties unsustainable.

2026 (8) TMI 1323
Case Laws Customs
Personal-use keyboard imports under a free tariff entry cannot be reclassified as dutiable goods under personal-import provisions.
Keyboards imported through courier for personal use remain classifiable under Customs Tariff Heading 8471 60 40 where that specific entry carries a free rate of duty. Chapter 98 overrides a specific tariff heading only when its conditions are met. Heading 9804 and the corresponding Schedule IV IGST entry apply only to dutiable goods imported for personal use; goods attracting no duty under their applicable tariff entry are not dutiable goods. Consequently, keyboards covered by the free-rate Heading 8471 60 40 cannot be reclassified under Heading 9804, and customs duty or IGST under that personal-import entry does not apply.

2026 (8) TMI 1324
Case Laws Customs
Aluminium profile classification remains under the specific heading when cut lengths retain uniform cross-section and profile characteristics at import.
Aluminium hollow profiles retain classification under the specific tariff heading for aluminium profiles where their objective characteristics, including uniform cross-section, remain intact at import. Cutting profiles to length, invoice descriptions, prior self-assessment and intended use in solar modules do not by themselves convert them into finished articles or justify classification under a residuary heading. Concessional customs treatment for Chapter 76 goods used to manufacture notified Solar PV Modules depends on the prescribed end-use procedure and valid end-use certificates, rather than possible alternative uses or precise classification within that Chapter. The stated amendment applies prospectively from 1 April 2022; concessional treatment remains available for earlier Bills of Entry meeting the conditions.

2026 (8) TMI 1325
Case Laws Customs
Redemption of confiscated foreign currency requires judicious discretion, not automatic refusal merely because the goods are prohibited.
Redemption of confiscated foreign currency under Section 125 of the Customs Act is discretionary where the currency was exported without declaration or required permission and may be treated as prohibited goods. That discretion must be exercised judiciously on the facts, rather than refused mechanically because the goods are prohibited. Relevant considerations include the absence of earlier Customs Act violations, payment of penalty, the statutory limit on redemption fine, and consistency with comparable cases. Refusal of redemption was set aside, requiring release of the currency upon payment of a redemption fine determined under Section 125.

2026 (8) TMI 1326
Case Laws Customs
Accrued SEIS benefits cannot be retrospectively curtailed by Foreign Trade Policy notifications affecting completed eligible service exports.
Retrospective amendments to the Foreign Trade Policy cannot extinguish Service Exports from India Scheme benefits accrued by exporters for eligible services already rendered and foreign exchange already earned. Section 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 permits formulation and amendment of the policy but does not authorise retrospective curtailment of accrued scheme entitlements. Notifications introducing Appendix 3X, excluding specified services and imposing a cap for FY 2019-20 operate only from their respective issue dates. Exporters remain entitled to SEIS benefits accrued during the relevant pre-notification period.

2026 (8) TMI 1327
Case Laws Benami Property
Benami transaction definition requires owner's lack of knowledge; acknowledged share allotment and buy-back consideration defeated the statutory claim.
Benami classification under Section 2(9)(C) requires that the ostensible owner be unaware of, or deny knowledge of, the property ownership. Job workers acknowledged during cross-examination that they knew of the share allotment, buy-back and consideration credited to their bank accounts. These statements outweighed inconsistent earlier income-tax statements. Allegations of fictitious trade payables or tax evasion could not independently establish a benami transaction without satisfying the statutory knowledge requirement. The income-tax settlement order did not override the separate benami regime. The share transactions therefore fell outside Section 2(9)(C), and refusal to confirm provisional attachment was sustained.

2026 (8) TMI 1328
Case Laws Income Tax
Excess Interest Spread paid to a non-investor originator in a securitisation trust does not attract withholding tax.
Tax deduction under section 194LBC applies only to income payable to an investor in respect of that investor's investment in a securitisation trust. Excess Interest Spread paid to an originator that neither subscribed to pass-through certificates nor otherwise invested in the trust does not meet those conditions. Maintaining the minimum retention requirement through cash collateral does not make the originator an investor for this purpose. As the payment represents residual surplus under the transaction waterfall rather than income from an investment, no tax is deductible under section 194LBC, and default consequences under sections 201(1) and 201(1A) do not arise.

2026 (8) TMI 1329
Case Laws Income Tax
Interest on enhanced land compensation forms part of compensation, not taxable income from other sources.
Interest awarded under Section 28 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 on enhanced compensation for compulsorily acquired land is treated as an accretion to the land's value and forms part of enhanced compensation. It differs from interest under Section 34, which compensates for delayed payment. Income-tax amendments governing interest on compensation address the timing of taxation of interest income and do not change the character of Section 28 interest. Accordingly, Section 28 interest is not assessable under the head Income from Other Sources.

2026 (8) TMI 1330
Case Laws Income Tax
Reassessment notice requirements, tribal income exemption and unexplained bank deposits turn on filing returns and credible source evidence.
Notice under Section 143(2) is not required for reassessment where no valid return is filed under Section 139 or in response to a notice under Section 148. Exemption under Section 10(26) applies only to qualifying income computed under the Act, not to gross receipts or bank deposits; tribal status, residence documentation and GST registration alone do not establish eligible business income. Cash deposits may be assessed as unexplained money under Section 69A where the taxpayer fails to substantiate their nature and source with reliable business records, books of account, bills, vouchers or financial statements.

2026 (8) TMI 1331
Case Laws Income Tax
Transfer pricing benchmarks upheld for foreign loans and standby credit, while approved R&D deductions remain independent of DSIR quantification.
Foreign-currency loans to associated enterprises may be benchmarked under the Comparable Uncontrolled Price method using foreign lending rates and external comparable borrowings; a domestic cost-of-funds approach is not a comparable uncontrolled price for an international loan. Interest charged at LIBOR plus 350 basis points was treated as arm's length. A standby letter of credit for an associated enterprise's borrowing requires arm's length benchmarking, with the corporate-guarantee benchmark restricted to 0.5% absent material supporting a higher fee. Weighted deduction for eligible expenditure on a DSIR-approved in-house research and development facility is not limited to the amount quantified in Form 3CL.

2026 (8) TMI 1332
Case Laws Income Tax
TNMM comparables require functional and economic similarity; accounting-year differences and non-persistent losses alone do not justify exclusion.
Transactional net margin method comparables for captive data-processing and software-development services must be functionally and economically similar. Rule 10B(4) permits use of data from the two preceding years; a company is not a persistent loss-maker merely because it incurred losses in some relevant years, and a differing accounting year alone does not require exclusion where quarterly data can be extrapolated. Companies with materially different business models, substantial outsourcing, high-end services, software products, diversified licensing activities, significant brands or intangibles, entrepreneurial scale, or unreliable segmental data should be excluded. Repair and maintenance provisions require verification of supporting evidence, subsequent crystallisation and reversal, consistent with DRP directions.

2026 (8) TMI 1333
Case Laws Income Tax
Corporate support charges escaped withholding tax because services lacked make-available features and the recipient had no Indian permanent establishment.
Corporate charges paid to a Singapore group entity for managerial, administrative, marketing and business-support services were not chargeable to tax in India. The services did not make available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes for the payer's independent future use and therefore were not fees for technical services under the India-Singapore tax treaty. No cogent material established either a fixed place or dependent-agent permanent establishment in India, so the recipient's business profits were not taxable in India. The more beneficial treaty provisions prevailed over domestic law; accordingly, no tax-withholding obligation or related disallowance arose.

2026 (8) TMI 1334
Case Laws Income Tax
Franchise-right depreciation uses full acquisition cost, while management-fee reimbursement requires evidence-based transfer-pricing review through prescribed referral.
IPL franchise rights that confer exclusive commercial rights to own and operate a franchise, participate in the league and exploit related revenue streams constitute depreciable intangible business or commercial rights. Their actual cost is the full contractual consideration when liability arises on acquisition; deferred instalments are only a payment mode, subject to written-down-value adjustment if consideration is later altered. Transfer-pricing review must test arm's-length consideration and cannot question the commercial expediency, necessity or adequacy of services. Management-fee reimbursement requires fresh determination on supporting evidence rather than a nil value. Where aggregate international transactions exceed the prescribed threshold, a binding CBDT Instruction requires reference to the Transfer Pricing Officer; an internal action plan cannot alter that requirement.

2026 (8) TMI 1335
Case Laws Income Tax
Correct statutory exemption claims can receive appellate relief despite delayed filings, incorrect return provisions, and processing-intimation limitations.
Appellate authorities may condone delayed appeals and entertain a legally available exemption claim even where the return cited an incorrect provision and no adjustment arose in the processing intimation. Compensation paid to BSNL employees under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2019 is treated as retrenchment compensation eligible for exemption under Section 10(10B), reflecting the scheme's workforce-reduction purpose. Eligible retired employees are also treated as deemed Central Government employees for leave-encashment exemption under Section 10(10AA); the enhanced beneficial exemption limit applies in appellate proceedings. These principles support substantive relief based on the correct statutory exemption rather than the original characterisation of the claim.

2026 (8) TMI 1336
Case Laws Income Tax
Offshore sales remain outside Indian taxation where no Indian business connection, permanent establishment, or profit-generating operations exist.
Offshore sales by a non-resident to an Indian affiliate or customers are not taxable in India where contracts are concluded and title and risk pass outside India, and no sales-related operations are undertaken in India. Under the business-connection rule, only income attributable to Indian operations may be taxed. An Indian affiliate does not create a fixed-place permanent establishment unless its premises are at the foreign enterprise's disposal, and does not create an agency permanent establishment without authority to conclude contracts, habitually secure orders, or maintain stock for delivery. In the absence of a business connection or permanent establishment, no business profits are attributable to India under the treaty.

TMI Search

Back

All TMI Search

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

TMI Search

Back

All TMI Search

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Topics

Acts Income Tax