Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    ManualsIncome Tax
    What is the taxability of opening balance as on 1st day of April 2016 of Foreign Currency Translatio...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Since section 43A is applicable for a foreign currency liability in respect of an asset acquired fro...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    How to recognise the exchange difference In respect of transactions that are settled beyond the end ...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    How are foreign exchange differences to be recognized.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    What is the manner in which foreign currency transactions are to be recorded.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    What is the treatment of expenditure incurred on test runs.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    What is the value at which fixed assets are to be recorded as per ICDS V relating to tangible fixed ...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    If the taxpayer sells a security on the 30th day of April 2017. The interest payment dates are Decem...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Does ICDS-IV apply to interest received by an assessee on compensation or on enhanced compensation.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Whether ICDS is applicable to revenues which are liable to tax on gross basis like interest, royalty...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    The condition of reasonable certainty of ultimate collection is not laid down for taxation of intere...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    How revenue from leases and hire purchase transactions will be recognised.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Since there is no specific scope exclusion for real estate developers and Build -Operate- Transfer (...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Whether the costs incurred for securing the contract would have to be claimed in the year of incurre...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    What is the treatment of incidental income that arises from construction contract.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Does proviso to section 36(1)(iii) apply on construction contract i.e. interest paid on capital borr...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    whether the recognition of retention money, receipt of which is contingent on the satisfaction of ce...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    What is the manner of recognizing contract revenue during the early stages of a contract.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    What is the manner of recognition of revenue and expenses from construction contracts under ICDS III...
    ManualsIncome Tax
    How to deal with a case where contract revenue is not recorded in the books of account, but offered ...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Taxability of foreign currency translation reserve: opening FCTR to be included in income unless previously recognised, requiring professional judgment.
    The opening balance of the Foreign Currency Translation Reserve (FCTR) as on 1 April 2016 relating to exchange differences on monetary items for non integral foreign operations shall be recognised in the relevant previous year as income to the extent not previously included in income computation; the correctness of this recognition is debatable and requires appropriate professional judgment because conversion does not create real income and ICDS treatment may not apply to earlier years.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Foreign currency liabilities treatment: exchange differences on monetary items hit profit or loss; non monetary differences not taxable or deductible.
    Section 43A does not apply to foreign currency liabilities for purchase of assets in India; such liabilities are governed by ICDS VI. Per ICDS VI para 5(i), exchange differences on monetary items are recognised in the profit and loss account, whereas exchange differences on non monetary items are neither taxable nor deductible.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Exchange difference recognition requires periodic recognition until final settlement, treated as income or expense for monetary items.
    Exchange differences on monetary transactions settled after the end of the previous year must be recognised in each intervening period up to final settlement, with exchange gain or loss on settlement treated as income or expense, except for items relating to nonintegral foreign operations.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Foreign exchange differences: monetary item gains and losses recognised as income or expense, non-monetary conversion differences excluded.
    Exchange differences on monetary items (cash and assets or liabilities receivable or payable in fixed or determinate amounts of money) arising on settlement or on the last day of the financial year must be recognised as income or expense of that year. Exchange differences on non-monetary items arising on conversion at the last day of the year are not to be recorded as income or expense for that year.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Foreign currency transaction recording: use transaction-date exchange rate or a stable weekly/monthly average when fluctuations are insignificant.
    Under ICDS VI, a foreign currency transaction must be initially recorded in the reporting currency using the exchange rate on the transaction date; if rates do not fluctuate significantly from actuals, a weekly or monthly average rate may be used instead.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Capitalization of test-run and commissioning expenditure: pre-commercial costs capitalized, post-commercial costs treated as revenue excluding general overheads.
    Expenditure on start-up and commissioning, including test runs and experimental production, must be capitalized as part of the cost of the tangible fixed asset until commercial production begins; expenditure after commercial production is revenue expenditure. Administration and general overheads not relating to a specific tangible fixed asset are excluded from asset cost and treated as revenue expenditure.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Valuation of tangible fixed assets requires recording at actual cost including nonrecoverable taxes and directly attributable expenditures.
    Valuation of tangible fixed assets under ICDS V requires recording assets at actual cost, comprising purchase price, duties and taxes that are not recoverable, and other directly attributable expenditure necessary to bring the asset to its intended use; recoverable taxes are excluded.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Accrual basis interest recognition: interest taxed on accrual must be included when computing capital gain from subsequent sale.
    Where interest has been accounted as income on an accrual basis before the sale of a security, the amount already taxed as interest income on accrual basis shall be taken into account for computation of income arising from such sale.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Interest on compensation taxed as Income from Other Sources when received; accounting standard ICDS does not displace the statute.
    Interest received on compensation or enhanced compensation is taxable in the year of receipt and must be reported under Income from Other Sources, regardless of whether the assessee uses mercantile or cash accounting; where ICDS IV conflicts with the Act the statute prevails.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    ICDS applicability to gross-basis incomes confirms ICDS governs computation of taxable interest, royalty and fees for technical services.
    ICDS IV (Revenue Recognition) applies to incomes taxed on a gross basis, including interest, royalty and fees for technical services payable to non-residents, and such receipts must be computed and recognized under ICDS principles for determining the amount chargeable to tax.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Accrual-based revenue recognition: interest and royalty must be recognised despite collection uncertainty; statutory provisions prevail.
    Interest is recognised on a time basis and royalty according to contractual terms; later non recovery may be claimed as a deduction under the amended deduction provisions, and applicable statutory provisions prevail over ICDS IV.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Revenue recognition for leases: lease treated as income not sale; lessor taxed on rent and entitled to depreciation.
    ICDS IV recognises revenue when risk and rewards transfer, so leases are not sales: lease rent is taxable income and the lessor may claim depreciation. Under hire purchase, both parties cannot claim depreciation on the same asset; substance-over-form principles indicate the owner giving the asset on hire should recognise sale while the hirer is entitled to depreciation.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Revenue recognition under ICDS IV applies to real estate developers and BOT operators absent a specific exclusion.
    In the absence of any specific ICDS notified for real estate developers, BOT projects and leases, the relevant provisions of the Income tax Act and applicable ICDS (including ICDS III and ICDS IV) apply to revenue recognition, income computation and disclosure for those transactions.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Work-in-progress treatment: costs to secure construction contracts must be capitalised and not deducted until related work is performed.
    Precontract costs to secure construction contracts must be treated as an asset and characterised as work-in-progress, representing amounts due from customers, and therefore should not be claimed as a deduction in the year of incurrence but carried forward and recognised when the related construction or installation work is performed.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Incidental income in construction contracts: deduct from contract costs; investment returns taxed separately under income provisions.
    Incidental incomes arising from construction contracts are not part of contract revenue and must be reduced from contract costs; examples include sale of surplus materials and disposal of plant and equipment. Income in the nature of interest, dividends and capital gains is excluded from incidental income and is taxed separately under applicable law.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Proviso to section 36(1)(iii) inapplicable to construction contracts; interest on contract borrowings is deductible for execution purposes.
    Proviso to section 36(1)(iii) does not apply to borrowings by contractors for executing construction contracts because such borrowings are not for acquisition of an asset; therefore interest on capital borrowed attributable to a construction contract is not barred by the proviso and is allowable as a deduction under ICDS III.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Retention money recognition: recognise as revenue only when reasonable certainty of ultimate collection exists under ICDS construction rules.
    Retention money within a construction contract is part of contract revenue and should be recognised as revenue on billing only when there is reasonable certainty of its ultimate collection, based on the contract's performance criteria and para 9 of ICDS on construction contracts.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Contract revenue recognition: recognize only costs incurred when outcome is not reliably estimable; early-stage limit applies.
    When the outcome of a construction contract cannot be estimated reliably, revenue is recognized only to the extent of costs incurred, subject to an early-stage completion limit specified in the Income Computation and Disclosure Standard on Construction Contracts.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Percentage of completion method recognizes construction contract revenue, expenses and profit by proportion of work completed.
    Recognition of revenue and expenses for construction contracts under ICDS III is governed by the percentage of completion method, whereby revenue, costs and profit are recognized by reference to the stage of completion of contract activity on the reporting date and reported in proportion to work completed.
    ManualsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Bad debt deduction available without book write off when previously taxed income becomes irrecoverable under the statutory proviso.
    If contract revenue was offered to tax under ICDS but not recorded in the books and later becomes irrecoverable, it cannot be written off in the absence of a book entry; instead, deduction may be claimed under the statutory proviso allowing bad debt deduction without book write off where the amount was taken into account in computing income in the previous year in which it became irrecoverable or an earlier year.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Comparison of Section 156 "Rebate of income-tax in case of certain individuals." between the Income-Tax Act, 2025 (as passed) and the Income-Tax Bill, 2025 (as originally introduced)

      3 September, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Section 156 Rebate of income-tax in case of certain individuals.

      Income-tax Act, 2025

      At a Glance

      Clause 156 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - (Old Version) provides for a rebate/deduction from income-tax for certain resident individuals based on total income thresholds of Rs. 5,00,000 and Rs. 12,00,000, with monetary caps of Rs. 12,500 and Rs. 60,000 respectively. It affects resident individual taxpayers and the tax department's computation of tax liability. Effective date: Not stated in the document.

      Background & Scope

      Statutory hook: Clause 156 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 (Rebate of income-tax in case of certain individuals). The provision is situated under the Bill's rubric "Rebates and reliefs." The clause aims to provide a deduction from income-tax payable for resident individual assessees whose total income falls below specified thresholds. The clause refers to computation "before allowing the deduction under this section" and to tax charged u/s 202(1). Definitions of "resident," "total income," or "income-tax payable" are Not stated in the document (they are presumed to be defined elsewhere in the Bill/Act). The clause contains three sub-sections setting out the conditions and caps for the deduction.

      Statutory Provision Mode

      Text & Scope

      Clause 156 provides as follows (material elements synthesized):

      • Sub-section (1): A resident individual assessee whose total income does not exceed Rs. 5,00,000 is entitled to a deduction from income-tax (computed before this deduction) equal to 100% of income-tax payable or Rs. 12,500, whichever is less.
      • Sub-section (2): Where a resident individual's total income is chargeable to tax u/s 202(1), deductions from income-tax (computed before this deduction) are allowed as follows: (a) if total income does not exceed Rs. 12,00,000, then 100% of income-tax payable or Rs. 60,000, whichever is less; (b) if income exceeds Rs. 12,00,000, then "the income-tax payable on the total income, reduced by total income which is in excess of twelve lakh rupees."
      • Sub-section (3): The deduction under sub-section (2) shall not exceed income-tax payable as per the rates provided in section 202(1).

      Scope: The relief is available only to resident individual assessees and is expressed as a deduction from income-tax chargeable on total income; it expressly contemplates interaction with section 202(1) tax computation.

      Interpretation

      The clause frames the relief as a deduction from the tax liability (not from gross income). The use of caps (Rs. 12,500 and Rs. 60,000) establishes fixed monetary ceilings. Sub-section (2) differentiates treatment depending on whether total income crosses the Rs. 12,00,000 threshold. The reference to tax computed "before allowing the deduction under this section" clarifies the order of computation: tax is calculated first, then the rebate/deduction is applied up to the stated limits. The provision's language in clause (2)(b) is formulaic and requires arithmetic reduction of tax payable by the excess of income over Rs. 12,00,000.

      Exceptions/Provisos

      No express provisos beyond the numerical thresholds and caps are provided. There is no textual carve-out for non-residents, non-individuals, or particular categories of income; however, the clause is expressly limited to "resident individual assessee." Any other exceptions or exclusions are Not stated in the document.

      Illustrations

      • Example 1: Total income = Rs. 4,50,000; income-tax computed before rebate = Rs. 10,000. Under sub-section (1), deduction = 100% of tax payable (Rs. 10,000) or Rs. 12,500 whichever is less; deduction = Rs. 10,000; net tax = nil.
      • Example 2: Total income = Rs. 11,00,000; income-tax computed before rebate (u/s 202(1)) = Rs. 50,000. Under sub-section (2)(a) deduction = 100% of tax payable or Rs. 60,000 whichever is less; deduction = Rs. 50,000; net tax = nil.
      • Example 3: Total income = Rs. 13,00,000; income-tax computed before rebate = Rs. 80,000. Under sub-section (2)(b) deduction = income-tax payable reduced by the excess over Rs. 12,00,000 (i.e., 80,000 minus 1,00,000) per the Bill's formula. Because that arithmetic would produce a negative number (-Rs. 20,000), the limitation in sub-section (3) and general interpretive principle that deduction cannot be negative means the deduction would effectively be nil; the text states the deduction "shall not exceed income-tax payable" but does not expressly address negative results - consequentially, a reasonable administrative interpretation would yield nil deduction. (Note: precise administrative treatment is Not stated in the document.)

      Interplay

      The clause explicitly interacts with section 202(1) - the rebate in sub-section (2) applies where total income is chargeable to tax under that section and sub-section (3) caps deductions to the tax payable "as per the rates provided in section 202(1)." References to other Rules, Notifications, or Circulars are Not stated in the document. The Bill does not provide procedural rules for claiming the deduction, nor does it reference forms or assessment mechanics; those matters are Not stated in the document.

      Differences between Section 156 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 and Clause 156 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025 - (Old Version)

      • Textual framing of subsection (1): The Bill (old version) uses the phrasing "A resident individual assessee" while the enacted Section uses "An assesse, being an individual resident in India."
        • Practical impact: purely stylistic; no substantive change to coverage (resident individual assessees remain the class eligible).
      • Subsection (2)(b) - Formulation and clarity of the deduction for incomes above Rs. 12 lakh: The Bill (old version) states: "the income exceeds twelve lakh rupees, the income-tax payable on the total income, reduced by total income which is in excess of twelve lakh rupees." The enacted Section states the condition more elaborately: "the total income exceeds twelve lakh rupees and the income-tax payable on such total income exceeds the amount by which the total income is in excess of twelve lakh rupees, an amount equal to the amount by which the income-tax payable on such total income is in excess of the amount by which the total income exceeds twelve lakh rupees."
        • Practical impact: The Bill's wording appears to direct a mechanical reduction of "income-tax payable" by the amount of income in excess of Rs. 12 lakh (a mismatch of units and likely leading to ambiguity/anomalous results). The enacted Section sets a conditional test and then grants a deduction equal to the excess of the tax payable over the excess income-thus the enacted text is clearer and avoids unit-mismatch confusion. In practice, the enacted text limits and clarifies the quantum of rebate available for higher incomes; the Bill's formulation could have produced interpretive and computational difficulties, possibly producing an unintended (and unworkable) formula.
      • Overall clarity and drafting precision: The enacted Section contains more precise conditional language in sub-section (2)(b).
        • Practical impact: reduced ambiguity for assessing officers, taxpayers and tax practitioners when computing the rebate for incomes exceeding Rs. 12 lakh; lowers litigation risk over interpretation of the mathematical reduction contemplated.
      • Subsection (3): Both texts contain identical limiting language that deduction under sub-section (2) shall not exceed income-tax payable as per rates in section 202(1).
        • Practical impact: none; both prohibit the rebate exceeding tax payable under the cited rate provision.

      Practical Implications

      • Compliance and risk areas: Taxpayers must determine whether total income is within the specified thresholds and whether tax is chargeable u/s 202(1) to ascertain entitlement. The formula in clause (2)(b) can produce ambiguity where the excess of income over Rs. 12,00,000 equals or exceeds tax payable; the provision's terse phrasing in the Bill may give rise to interpretive disputes as to whether any deduction is permissible in those cases. The Bill text does not state dispute-resolution or administrative guidance; therefore taxpayers and the department may require clarificatory instructions (Not stated in the document).
      • Record-keeping/evidence: The document does not specify documentation or forms required to claim the deduction. Presumably, computation records showing total income and tax computed before the deduction would be relevant; the document itself is Not stated on record keeping.

      Key Takeaways

      • Clause 156 provides a tax rebate (deduction from tax payable) for resident individual assessees with total income thresholds at Rs. 5,00,000 and Rs. 12,00,000.
      • Caps are specified: Rs. 12,500 for incomes up to Rs. 5,00,000; Rs. 60,000 for incomes up to Rs. 12,00,000.
      • For incomes above Rs. 12,00,000, the Bill prescribes a formula reducing tax payable by the excess of income over Rs. 12,00,000; the clause's terse wording may generate interpretive issues when the excess equals or exceeds tax payable.
      • The deduction is expressly subject to not exceeding tax payable u/s 202(1); other procedural and definitional matters are Not stated in the document.
      • Practical application requires careful arithmetic and may necessitate clarificatory guidance from the tax authorities to resolve edge cases arising under clause (2)(b).

      Full Text:

      Section 156 Rebate of income-tax in case of certain individuals.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax