Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ----
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Distinction between Capital Gains and Business Income: Comprehensive Analysis of a Income Tax Case
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    A Multifaceted Legal Analysis on Transfer Pricing and Tonnage Tax Scheme, Bareboat Charter, Interest...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Assessment of Eligibility for Tax Deductions Under Scrutiny: Tribunal Upholds PCIT's Revisionary Pow...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Insight into Penalties for Procedural Lapses in Customs Documentation
    Legalities of Input Tax Credit Refunds (IGST), period of limitation and COVID-19 pandemic: A Case St...
    Case LawsCentral Excise
    Reversal of CENVAT Credit: A Critical Analysis of a Recent Legal Dispute
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Taxation of Employee Benefits: TDS on value of accommodation provided to the employees at the rate o...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    The Intricacies of Unexplained Investment and Legal Recourse: A Comprehensive Analysis of a recent C...
    Navigating Legal Intricacies: Power to arrest under PMLA and compliance with CrPC
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Intricacies of Taxation on Interconnect Charges in Telecom: Unraveling the Concept of 'Use or Right ...
    Case LawsVAT / Sales Tax
    The Priority of Secured Creditors in Financial Recoveries: A Comprehensive Analysis of Central Bank ...
    Navigating the Intricacies of Seizure and Confiscation under the GST Regime: A Detailed Analysis of ...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    The Principle of Mutuality in Taxation: A Comprehensive Analysis of a Landmark Supreme Court Decisio...
    Case LawsService Tax
    Legal Nuances in CENVAT Credit Rules and Extended Limitation Periods: A Detailed Analysis
    Case LawsService Tax
    Cenvat Credit - Input Service Distributors and the Extended Period of Limitation in Service Tax Law:...
    Case LawsCustoms
    Complexities of Gold Importation - Prohibited Goods and Redemption: An Analysis of the 2023 (8) TMI...
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    A Case Study on Condonation of Delay in filing the Appeal in Indian Legal System
    Restrictions on availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) - constitutional validity of Section 16(4): A Landma...
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Landmark Income Tax Reassessment Case
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    A Legal Dissection of Best Judgment Assessments in Tax Law, in the context of Sections 153A/153C in ...
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Classification of property income: conversion into business income denies capital-gains relief and alters deduction eligibility.
    Where land initially held as a capital asset is developed and sold through partnership activity with a profit motive, the asset can be characterized as having undergone conversion into stock-in-trade and treated as business income; that characterization determines tax consequences by excluding capital-gains-specific deductions and reinvestment reliefs, and depends on the taxpayer's intention and the transactional pattern.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Transfer pricing applicability to tonnage tax scheme narrowed; tonnage-covered operations exempted from transfer pricing obligations.
    Transfer pricing provisions were held inapplicable to operations covered by the Tonnage Tax Scheme, and transfer pricing adjustments based on differential interest for a bareboat charter cum demise lease were rejected in light of prior consistent rulings. The Tribunal treated the relevant interest income and expenditure as business income, examined whether a negative lien equated to a fee-bearing corporate guarantee, and reviewed allocation principles for common interest and hire-charge adjustments between tonnage and non-tonnage activities.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Revisionary power under section 263 upholds reassessment where deduction eligibility under section 80IB(11A) is lacking.
    The PCIT found the assessee ineligible for the deduction under section 80IB because operations commenced outside the period in section 80IB(11A); the original assessment accepted the deduction without examining this eligibility. The PCIT issued a show-cause and, treating the original order as erroneous and prejudicial to revenue, exercised revisionary power under section 263 to quash the order and direct reassessment, the Tribunal upholding that revision was appropriate where the error was beyond mere rectification remedies.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Proportionality in customs penalties: enhanced fines require adequate justification and consideration of compliance efforts by authorities.
    The legal issue concerns penalties under the provisional duty assessment regulations for delayed document submission; adjudicators must assess the limited nature of procedural lapses, consider compliance efforts where documents are produced during show cause proceedings, and apply proportionality principles. Enhanced penalties require adequate, reasoned justification, and adjudicators should determine whether a nominal penalty already imposed is commensurate with the lapse and its impact on finalizing provisional assessment and duty realization.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Limitation exclusion for pandemic renders delayed ITC refund claims timely under CGST limitation provision, court applies notification.
    The court held that the pandemic period exclusion notification applies to computation of the limitation for refunds of unutilised Input Tax Credit arising from exports under a letter of undertaking. After assessing eligibility issues and time barred components of the ITC claim, the court found the appellate conclusion of limitation unsustainable and quashed the impugned order, applying the notification to the refund computation.
    Case LawsCentral Excise
    Show AI Summary
    CENVAT credit reversal: elective accounting options cannot be imposed on a taxpayer, limiting percentage-based recovery.
    Dispute concerns entitlement to reverse CENVAT credit when a manufacturer produces both dutiable and exempt goods without separate records. Rule 6(3) provides elective options for taxpayers not maintaining segregated accounts but authorities cannot impose those options on the assessee. Rule 14 and statutory recovery provisions allow recovery of wrongly availed credit, yet there is no statutory basis to mandate recovery by applying fixed percentages to the value of exempted goods; if the assessee has already reversed credit attributable to exempted production, additional percentage-based demands or penalties lack legal support.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Perquisite valuation: absence of employer concession leads to no TDS on rent-free employee accommodation under valuation rules.
    The tribunal concluded that perquisite taxation on rent-free accommodation requires a demonstrable concession by the employer; in the absence of such concession the perquisite value is nil. Although the institution is not a Central Government entity, the Revenue's invocation of Rule 3 and fixed percentage valuation was premature. The appellate deletion of the withholding demand was affirmed on the ground that no concession existed and therefore no taxable perquisite arose.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Unexplained investments deemed taxable where cancellation deeds lack civil adjudication and source credibility is unproven.
    The tribunal sustained income tax additions under the unexplained investment provision, holding that the assessee failed to prove the creditworthiness and reality of alleged fund sources for a land purchase revealed in a survey, and that registered cancellation deeds without a civil court decree do not legally negate the original transaction for tax purposes.
    Case LawsPMLA
    Show AI Summary
    Power to arrest under PMLA requires recorded reasons and limits general arrest notice requirements, affecting remand review.
    Power to arrest under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act requires strict recording and communication of reasons for arrest and operates through a specialized, self-contained mechanism limiting the applicability of certain general arrest notices. Judicial remand and CrPC procedures apply only to the extent they do not conflict with the PMLA; habeas corpus is available for illegal detention but is not ordinarily to be used to routinely challenge reasoned, statutorily compliant remand orders.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Use or right to use: interconnect charges not treated as royalty under treaty because no transfer of use of IP.
    The core question was whether interconnect usage charges fall within royalty by virtue of conferring the use or right to use a process or equipment. The tribunal held that IUC did not amount to royalty because the telecommunications processes were standard industry practice, not proprietary or secret, and therefore did not grant a transferable right to exploit intellectual property; treaty interpretation under the DTAA controlled characterization.
    Case LawsVAT / Sales Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Priority of secured creditors affirmed over state tax claims under SARFAESI Act, reinforcing security interest protection in recoveries.
    The court's analysis centers on the statutory priority conferred by the SARFAESI framework for enforcement of security interests, treating secured creditors' lien-based rights as superior to government tax claims on the same charged asset and narrowing the traditional Crown Debt preference where the statutory enforcement regime specifies priorities.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Seizure powers under GST limited to goods and material useful to proceedings, excluding currency and requiring necessity.
    The power to inspect, search and seize under Section 67 is confined to items believed to be liable for confiscation or material useful to proceedings; the statutory definition excludes money from 'goods', seizure must be necessary for GST proceedings, and items not relied upon in subsequent notice are to be returned within a limited period, reflecting a narrower interpretation of 'things' consistent with legislative intent.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Principle of mutuality: interest on clubs' bank deposits treated as commercial income and not mutuality-exempt.
    The Court analysed whether investing clubs' surplus funds in bank fixed deposits preserved the identity between contributors and beneficiaries required by the Principle of Mutuality. It found that such investments diverted funds into commercial dealings with third parties and were not applied directly for members' mutual services, thereby breaking mutuality. As a result, interest earned on those investments did not qualify as exempt mutual receipts and was treated as taxable income.
    Case LawsService Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Extended limitation period: requires proof of fraud or wilful suppression; mere self-assessment errors are insufficient.
    The tribunal held that invocation of the extended period of limitation for recovery of irregularly availed CENVAT credit requires affirmative grounds such as fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, or suppression of facts; mere incorrect self-assessment, audit disagreement, or discovery during audit does not establish the necessary intent to evade, and therefore demands beyond the normal limitation period (except conceded amounts) could not be sustained.
    Case LawsService Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Cenvat credit validity vs procedural lapses: extended limitation requires evidence of fraud or suppression to apply.
    Whether a PSU could claim CENVAT credit through its Head Office functioning as an Input Service Distributor despite documentation lapses, and whether the Department could invoke the extended period of limitation were examined. The focus is on reconciling substantive receipt of services with procedural compliance, and on the requisite showing of fraud, collusion, willful misstatement, or suppression of facts to justify extending limitation beyond the normal period; mere delay without such evidence does not suffice.
    Case LawsCustoms
    Show AI Summary
    Gold importation without declaration: whether undeclared imports amount to smuggling and bar redemption under customs law.
    The petitions question whether undeclared gold imports that bypass the Green Channel constitute prohibited goods or smuggling under the Customs Act, 1962, and whether adjudicating authorities properly exercised discretion under Section 125 in confiscating goods and denying redemption, given alleged arbitrariness and inconsistent treatment.
    Case LawsIndian Laws
    Show AI Summary
    Delay condonation in land acquisition appeals hinges on whether administrative impediments amount to sufficient cause.
    Delay condonation in land acquisition appeals hinges on whether administrative or bureaucratic impediments amount to a sufficient cause rather than an excuse; courts must assess explanations case-by-case, balancing procedural discipline against substantive justice while guarding against routine tolerance of government inefficiency.
    Case LawsGST
    Show AI Summary
    Input Tax Credit time-bar upheld: legislative limits on ITC claims are valid, treating ITC as a conditional concession.
    The time-limit for claiming Input Tax Credit (ITC) was upheld as a permissible legislative condition: ITC is a concession contingent on statutory requirements, temporal restrictions fall within legislative competence, and business forms like proprietorships cannot invoke trade-right protections in the same manner as citizens; judicial interference in fiscal policy is limited where statutory mechanisms govern tax benefits.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Reassessment notice limitations restrict tax authorities when issued beyond limitation or without mandated approval or procedural defects.
    A reassessment issued after the three year limitation period and without approval from the specified authority fails statutory prerequisites and cannot sustain reassessment. Reassessment powers are limited to non disclosure or material misstatement of facts in the original assessment and do not extend to changes of opinion. TOLA 2020 does not expand substantive reassessment powers or alter approval requirements, and correct classification of expenses as capital or revenue remains central to tax consequence determinations.
    Case LawsIncome Tax
    Show AI Summary
    Best judgment assessment standards tightened when linked to search-and-seizure reassessments requiring documented satisfaction and DIN compliance.
    Best judgment assessment under Section 144 is examined alongside Sections 153A and 153C, stressing that invocation of Section 144 must be grounded in the legitimate scope opened by search-related reassessments. The court emphasises that the Assessing Officer's satisfaction note must be substantively supported, administrative formalities such as a Document Identification Number must be complied with, and that extensions of assessment periods require concrete evidentiary justification.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Addressing Cross-Border Taxation of Foreign Retirement Benefits : Clause 158 of Income Tax Bill, 2025 Vs. Section 89A of Income Tax Act, 1961

      22 April, 2025

      Contents
      Acts
      Rules & Regulations
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Clause 158 Relief from taxation in income from retirement benefit account maintained in a notified country.

      Income Tax Bill, 2025

      Introduction

      Clause 158 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, and Section 89A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, both address a nuanced but increasingly relevant issue in Indian taxation: the timing and manner of taxing income accrued in retirement benefit accounts maintained in foreign jurisdictions by individuals who have returned to India after a period of residence abroad. The evolution of these provisions reflects the growing mobility of Indian professionals and the government's attempt to harmonize domestic tax treatment with international practices, thereby preventing double taxation and providing relief in genuine hardship cases. The significance of these provisions is heightened by the proliferation of cross-border employment and the increased incidence of Indian residents holding retirement accounts in countries following a "taxation on withdrawal" regime, notably the United States, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and Canada. The legal framework aims to address the mismatch arising when such income is taxed in the foreign country upon withdrawal, while Indian tax law, without a specific provision, would tax it on accrual, potentially leading to double taxation or timing mismatches. This commentary undertakes a detailed analysis of Clause 158, explores its objectives and mechanics, and provides a comparative assessment with the existing Section 89A. The discussion further explores practical implications, interpretative challenges, and potential areas for legislative or judicial refinement.

      Objective and Purpose

      Legislative Intent

      Both Clause 158 and Section 89A are designed to address the peculiar tax issues faced by "returning Indians" who have accumulated retirement savings in foreign countries. The central policy objective is to prevent double taxation or undue hardship arising from differences in the timing of taxability between India and the foreign jurisdiction. The legislative intent is clear: provide relief to individuals who, while being non-residents, contributed to retirement benefit accounts in countries where taxation is deferred until withdrawal, and who, upon returning to India and becoming residents, would otherwise face tax on an accrual basis under Indian law, potentially much before actual receipt or foreign tax liability arises.

      Historical Background and Policy Considerations

      Originally section 89A was inserted by the Finance Act, 1982. Section 89A was reintroduced by the Finance Act, 2021, effective from assessment year 2022-23, in response to representations from non-resident Indians (NRIs) and returning Indians. The provision sought to align the Indian tax regime with international practice and remove the hardship of double taxation. Clause 158 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, appears to continue this policy, possibly with refinements or clarifications intended to ensure clarity, consistency, and effective administration.

      The policy considerations include:

      - Preventing double taxation and timing mismatches.

      - Facilitating ease of compliance for returning Indians.

      - Ensuring that relief is targeted and does not create opportunities for tax avoidance.

      - Aligning with international best practices and treaties.

      Detailed Analysis of Clause 158 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025

      Key Provisions and Interpretation

      1. Scope of Relief

      Clause 158(1) provides that "the income accrued in a specified account, maintained in a notified country by a specified person, shall be taxed in a tax year, as prescribed."

      This establishes the basic framework:

      - The relief is available only in respect of income accrued in a "specified account."

      - The account must be maintained in a "notified country."

      - The beneficiary must be a "specified person."

      - Taxation will occur in a prescribed manner and year, as determined by subordinate legislation (rules).

      2. Definitions

      Clause 158(2) defines the critical terms:

      (a) Notified Country

      - A "notified country" is one notified by the Central Government.

      - This allows the government to specify countries with compatible regulatory and tax frameworks, and to exclude countries that may pose compliance or enforcement challenges.

      (b) Specified Account

      - The account must be maintained in a notified country by the specified person for his retirement benefits.

      - It must be taxed by that country at the time of withdrawal or redemption, and not on an accrual basis.

      - This is crucial: the relief is targeted at accounts where the foreign country taxes only upon withdrawal, not annually on accrual.

      (c) Specified Person

      - A "specified person" is a resident in India who opened the specified account in a notified country while being a non-resident in India and a resident in that country.

      - This ensures the relief is only available to those who genuinely acquired the retirement account while abroad, not to those who open such accounts after becoming residents in India.

      3. Taxation in Prescribed Year and Manner

      Clause 158(1) leaves the actual timing and manner of taxation to be "prescribed." This is a significant feature, as it delegates the operational details to subordinate legislation, allowing flexibility to adapt to changes in international practice and administrative exigencies. The likely intent is to tax the income in the year in which it becomes taxable in the foreign country (i.e., upon withdrawal), thereby aligning the Indian tax event with the foreign tax event and preventing double taxation or cash flow mismatches.

      4. Administrative and Compliance Aspects

      The clause envisages a rule-making power to prescribe the detailed procedure:

      - How and when to report such income.

      - Documentary evidence required to establish eligibility.

      - Mechanism for tracking withdrawals and ensuring proper reporting. This is critical to prevent abuse and ensure that relief is granted only in genuine cases.

      5. Ambiguities and Potential Issues

      Several interpretative and practical challenges may arise:

      - Determining the exact nature of "accrued income" in the context of foreign retirement accounts, which may follow different accounting and tax conventions.

      - Ensuring that the "specified account" is not used as a vehicle for tax deferral or avoidance.

      - Coordination with Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTAAs) and ensuring that relief under Clause 158 does not conflict with treaty provisions or give rise to unintended benefits.

      - The open-ended nature of "as prescribed" creates uncertainty until rules are notified.

      Practical Implications

      Impact on Individuals

      For returning Indians, Clause 158 provides much-needed relief:

      - It prevents taxation of notional or unrealized income, thereby avoiding cash flow issues.

      - It aligns the Indian tax event with the foreign tax event, making it easier to claim foreign tax credits and comply with both jurisdictions.

      Impact on Businesses and Employers

      Multinational companies employing Indian professionals may find it easier to attract talent, as the risk of double taxation on retirement benefits is mitigated.

      Regulatory and Administrative Impact

      The provision imposes a compliance burden on both taxpayers and the tax authorities:

      - Taxpayers must maintain detailed records and comply with reporting requirements.

      - The tax authorities must verify eligibility, monitor withdrawals, and prevent abuse.

      - The notification of countries and accounts requires ongoing review and updating.

      Comparative Analysis: Clause 158 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, Vs. Section 89A of the Income Tax Act, 1961

      1. Structural and Substantive Parity

      A comparison of Clause 158 and Section 89A reveals near-identical language and intent. Both provisions:

      - Apply to income accrued in a specified account maintained in a notified country by a specified person.

      - Define "notified country," "specified account," and "specified person" in substantially similar terms.

      - Provide for taxation "in such manner and in such year as may be prescribed." This structural parity suggests that Clause 158 is intended to carry forward the relief provided by Section 89A, possibly with minor refinements or clarifications.

      2. Key Points of Convergence

      - Eligibility Criteria: Both provisions restrict relief to residents who opened the account while non-resident and resident in the foreign country.

      - Nature of Account: Both require the account to be taxed in the foreign country only on withdrawal, not on accrual.

      - Notification Mechanism: Both empower the Central Government to notify eligible countries.

      - Delegation to Rules: Both leave the operational details to be prescribed by rules.

      3. Differences and Refinements

      While the core provisions are virtually identical, the following points merit attention:

      - Legislative Context: Clause 158 is part of the new Income Tax Bill, 2025, which may involve a comprehensive overhaul or consolidation of the tax code. Section 89A is an amendment to the existing Income Tax Act, 1961.

      - Language and Structure: Clause 158 uses slightly modernized language and may be accompanied by new or revised rules under the new tax code.

      - Rule-making Power: Clause 158's reference to "as prescribed" may allow for greater flexibility or more detailed rules compared to the existing framework u/s 89A.

      - Potential for Expansion: The new Bill may envisage expansion to cover additional types of accounts or countries, depending on subsequent notifications.

      4. Interaction with DTAAs and Other Provisions

      Both provisions must be interpreted in harmony with India's network of DTAAs. Relief under Clause 158 or Section 89A should not defeat the intent of treaty provisions, nor should it result in double non-taxation. The government's power to notify countries allows it to manage this interaction and prevent abuse.

      5. Potential Gaps and Areas for Clarification

      - Scope of "Retirement Benefits": Neither provision defines "retirement benefits" in detail, potentially leading to disputes over eligibility of certain accounts (e.g., employer pension vs. individual retirement accounts).

      - Taxation of Growth vs. Principal: Clarification may be needed on whether relief applies to both principal and accretions, or only to the income component.

      - Partial Withdrawals: Treatment of partial withdrawals or phased annuity payments could give rise to complexities in timing and quantum of taxation.

      Conclusion

      Clause 158 of the Income Tax Bill, 2025, and Section 89A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, represent a considered legislative response to the challenges posed by cross-border retirement savings. By deferring Indian taxation to coincide with the foreign tax event, these provisions provide significant relief to returning Indians, prevent double taxation, and align Indian law with international norms. The provisions are carefully circumscribed to prevent abuse, with eligibility limited to accounts opened while non-resident and taxed on withdrawal in the foreign country. The reliance on government notification and rule-making ensures flexibility and administrative control. While Clause 158 largely mirrors Section 89A, its placement in the new Income Tax Bill may facilitate further refinement, expansion, or harmonization with the broader tax code. Key areas for further clarification include the precise scope of eligible accounts, treatment of partial withdrawals, and coordination with DTAAs. The practical impact is substantial: individuals benefit from relief, businesses can attract global talent, and tax authorities can administer the regime with clarity. Ongoing vigilance is required to prevent abuse and ensure that relief is targeted and effective.


      Full Text:

      Clause 158 Relief from taxation in income from retirement benefit account maintained in a notified country.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax