Just a moment...

⚠✕
❮ Top
☎ Help
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Keyword Search :
AI Tools : New
Ask tax questions in natural language. Powered by AI trained on the TaxTMI legal database. Use AI Tools ➞
Call Us / Help / Feedback✕

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search ✕
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
    6. Text Search
  6. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  7. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
    8. Text Search
╳
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
✕
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
❮ Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 TMI Notes - Adv. Search ❯
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text ❯
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----❯
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Benami Property
  • Bill
  • Central Excise
  • Companies Law
  • Customs
  • DGFT
  • FEMA
  • GST
  • GST - States
  • IBC
  • Income Tax
  • Indian Laws
  • Money Laundering
  • SEBI
  • SEZ
  • Service Tax
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Types:
---- All Types ---- ❯
  • ---- All Types ----
  • Act Rules
  • Case Laws
  • Circulars
  • Manuals
  • News
  • Notifications
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    ManualsService Tax
    Whether issuance of SCN under section 73 is mandatory to fix the liability of the assessee? Whether ...
    ManualsService Tax
    Whether it is necessary to provide opportunity of being heard before passing order of finalisation ...
    ManualsService Tax
    Whether appeal can be filed against the provisional assessment?
    ManualsService Tax
    Whether mere non filing of Memorandum in ST-3A means no provisional assessment has been made?
    ManualsService Tax
    Whether best judgement can be done by assessing authority totally arbitrarily i.e. based on his gues...
    ManualsService Tax
    What is the difference between Assessment based on Best Judgement and Assessment based on books of a...
    ManualsService Tax
    What is the meaning of Assessment? What is the meaning of Assessee?
    ManualsService Tax
    What is the relevance of self declaration given at the end of service tax return regarding to self a...
    ManualsService Tax
    Whether records can be preserved in electronic form? if yes, what procedure is need to be followed f...
    ManualsService Tax
    What will be treatment in case of partial reverse charge if service provider is covered under SSI ex...
    ManualsService Tax
    What changes have been made in services by way of supply of manpower for any purpose or security ser...
    ManualsService Tax
    What is the meaning of Partial reverse charge? Which services are covered under partial reverse char...
    ManualsService Tax
    What is the meaning of aggregator? Who is liable in the case of aggregator? What will be if aggregat...
    ManualsService Tax
    How the exemption under this notification will be calculated if the service provider has more than o...
    ManualsService Tax
    Whether Small service provider exemption is available to those persons who are covered under reverse...
    ManualsService Tax
    Whether service provider has the option of not availing the exemption under this notification?
    ManualsService Tax
    Whether service provided under own brand name or trade name is entitled to the exemption under notif...
    ManualsService Tax
    What are the consequences if registration is not granted with in 7 days of the application? Is there...
    ManualsService Tax
    Whether Registration of service tax can be refused ? Whether Service tax authorities can issue regis...
    ManualsService Tax
    Is it mandatory to surrender/ cancel the registration certificate after ceasing to provide taxable s...
❮
❯
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Open Link
    Notes
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
    ManualsService Tax
    Whether issuance of SCN under section 73 is mandatory to fix the liability of the assessee? Whether ...
    Show AI Summary
    SCN requirement: absence of a show-cause notice prevents imposition of service tax and interest under revision.
    Issuance of a show-cause notice under the demand provision is a prerequisite to fix service tax and interest; where only a penalty notice was issued under the penalty regime, the revisional authority cannot validly pass an order demanding service tax with interest because the penalty notice cannot substitute for a demand-stage show-cause notice.
    ManualsService Tax
    Whether it is necessary to provide opportunity of being heard before passing order of finalisation ...
    Show AI Summary
    Right to be heard required before finalising provisional assessment; taxpayer must be told grounds and allowed to respond.
    An assessing authority must inform the taxpayer of the specific grounds for proposed enhanced liability and afford a meaningful opportunity to meet those grounds before finalising a provisional assessment, as a baseline requirement of natural justice in assessment proceedings.
    ManualsService Tax
    Whether appeal can be filed against the provisional assessment?
    Show AI Summary
    Provisional assessment appeals permitted where statute and rules authorize provisional determinations, allowing aggrieved parties to prefer appeals.
    Provisional assessments are authorized by the Act and Rules, and an aggrieved party retains the right to appeal against such provisional assessments; the provisional nature does not by itself preclude preferring appeals under the applicable appellate procedure.
    ManualsService Tax
    Whether mere non filing of Memorandum in ST-3A means no provisional assessment has been made?
    Show AI Summary
    Non-filing of memorandum for provisional assessment is a procedural omission and does not negate provisional assessment.
    Non filing of the memorandum in Form ST 3A does not by itself negate the existence of a provisional assessment; the form serves to supply date wise details to enable the proper officer to make an accurate final assessment, and omission of that statement does not preclude that assessments were provisional, especially where the taxpayer later requests and the proper officer completes a final assessment.
    ManualsService Tax
    Whether best judgement can be done by assessing authority totally arbitrarily i.e. based on his gues...
    Show AI Summary
    Best judgment assessment must be reasoned, not arbitrary; it requires material support and more than mere guesswork.
    A best-judgement assessment allows limited estimation but the assessing officer must make an honest, fair and reasoned estimate and cannot act wholly arbitrarily; technical rules of evidence are relaxed but the assessment must be based on more than mere suspicion or pure guesswork and should be supported by adequate material rather than unsupported conjecture.
    ManualsService Tax
    What is the difference between Assessment based on Best Judgement and Assessment based on books of a...
    Show AI Summary
    Best judgment assessment: courts may not substitute their own estimate if the assessing authority's basis has reasonable nexus.
    Assessment based on accounts is proper where books are genuine and substantially correct, with only minor adjustments; a best judgment assessment is used when accounts are unreliable and the authority estimates liability using available accounts, other information and surrounding circumstances. Courts reviewing a best judgment assessment must first confirm that rejection of accounts was justified and then assess whether the estimating basis has a reasonable nexus to the estimated turnover; if so, the authority's bona fide estimate should not be displaced.
    ManualsService Tax
    What is the meaning of Assessment? What is the meaning of Assessee?
    Show AI Summary
    Assessment in service tax: scope includes self assessment, reassessment, provisional and best judgement modes and interest determination.
    Assessment for service tax includes self-assessment, reassessment, provisional assessment, best judgement assessment and any order where tax assessed is nil; it also includes determination of interest on assessed or reassessed tax. "Assessee" means a person liable to pay the tax and includes the person's agent.
    ManualsService Tax
    What is the relevance of self declaration given at the end of service tax return regarding to self a...
    Show AI Summary
    Untrue self-declaration in tax return corroborates suppression and can trigger penalty under self-assessment procedures.
    An untrue declaration in a service tax return asserting that tax has been paid corroborates suppression and attracts penalty; absence of a bona fide statement on the return or with the return renders the declaration faulty and imputes liability under the self-assessment procedure.
    ManualsService Tax
    Whether records can be preserved in electronic form? if yes, what procedure is need to be followed f...
    Show AI Summary
    Electronic preservation of records permitted subject to every page being authenticated by digital signature and prescribed safeguards.
    Preservation of records in electronic form is permitted provided each page of the record is authenticated by a digital signature, and the Board may prescribe further conditions, safeguards and procedures for maintaining digitally signed records.
    ManualsService Tax
    What will be treatment in case of partial reverse charge if service provider is covered under SSI ex...
    Show AI Summary
    Partial reverse charge: provider exempt under SSI does not pay; service receiver still liable for receiver's portion of tax.
    Where a service falls under partial reverse charge and the provider is covered by the SSI exemption and not liable to pay service tax, the provider's obligation to pay its share is eliminated while the service receiver remains independently liable to pay the receiver's portion under the reverse charge mechanism.
    ManualsService Tax
    What changes have been made in services by way of supply of manpower for any purpose or security ser...
    Show AI Summary
    Reverse charge liability now places full service tax responsibility on the service recipient for manpower and security services.
    W.e.f. notification no. 07/2015-ST the services by way of supply of manpower for any purpose and security services have been placed under a full reverse charge mechanism, making the service recipient exclusively liable to discharge the entire service tax; the earlier partial reverse charge split between recipient and service provider has been removed.
    ManualsService Tax
    What is the meaning of Partial reverse charge? Which services are covered under partial reverse char...
    Show AI Summary
    Partial reverse charge: service tax liability split between provider and recipient; third-party payers allowed under notification
    A scheme of partial reverse charge allocates service tax between provider and recipient by notifying services and the share payable by the recipient, the provider paying the remainder. As at 01/04/2015 the notification covers renting of passenger motor vehicles to persons not in the same business and the service portion of works contracts. The framework also allows liability to be placed on persons other than provider or recipient, for example a representative of an aggregator, where so notified.
    ManualsService Tax
    What is the meaning of aggregator? Who is liable in the case of aggregator? What will be if aggregat...
    Show AI Summary
    Aggregator liability: platform owners bear service tax responsibility, with representatives appointed if no taxable territory presence.
    An "aggregator" is the owner manager of a web based application enabling customers to connect with service providers under the aggregator's brand; the aggregator is the person liable for paying service tax for services involving the aggregator. If the aggregator lacks physical presence in the taxable territory, a person representing the aggregator in that territory is liable; if there is neither presence nor representative, the aggregator must appoint a person in the territory who will be liable to pay service tax.
    ManualsService Tax
    How the exemption under this notification will be calculated if the service provider has more than o...
    Show AI Summary
    Aggregate value rule: combined turnover across services and premises determines small service provider exemption; co-owners assessed individually.
    Exemption is applied to the aggregate value of all taxable services provided from all premises by a provider, and eligibility is determined by aggregating previous year turnover across all premises; where premises are co-owned, each co-owner may claim the exemption separately if, on individual assessment, their aggregate taxable services fall within the threshold.
    ManualsService Tax
    Whether Small service provider exemption is available to those persons who are covered under reverse...
    Show AI Summary
    Reverse charge excludes recipients from small service provider exemption when they are liable to pay service tax.
    The Small service provider exemption does not extend to persons liable to pay service tax as service recipients under the Reverse Charge Mechanism; values of taxable services for which tax is payable by such person under sub-section (2) of section 68 read with the Service Tax Rules are excluded from the notification's exemption.
    ManualsService Tax
    Whether service provider has the option of not availing the exemption under this notification?
    Show AI Summary
    Option to decline small-provider exemption allows service providers to pay service tax and claim CENVAT credit from that date.
    Service providers may elect during a financial year to forego the small-provider value-based exemption and pay service tax, but the election is irrevocable for that financial year. Upon electing to pay service tax, the provider may avail CENVAT credit only for inputs or input services received on or after the date service tax payments commence and used for taxable services for which service tax is payable.
    ManualsService Tax
    Whether service provided under own brand name or trade name is entitled to the exemption under notif...
    Show AI Summary
    Brand name usage and service tax exemption: services under own brand remain eligible; exclusion covers use of another's brand.
    Exemption for small service providers applies when services are provided under the provider's own brand name or trade name; the notification excludes only taxable services provided under a brand or trade name of another person, whether registered or not.
    ManualsService Tax
    What are the consequences if registration is not granted with in 7 days of the application? Is there...
    Show AI Summary
    Deemed registration applies when the local superintendent delays issuance, but not to centralized registration by the Commissioner.
    Failure of the Superintendent of Central Excise to issue Form ST-2 within seven days triggers deemed registration; that deeming provision applies only to registrations by the Superintendent and not to centralized registrations granted by the Commissioner, where no statutory time limit exists. Registration must nevertheless be granted within a reasonable time, and administrative circulars treating seven days as reasonable impose directory guidance and accountability but do not create deemed registration for the Commissioner.
    ManualsService Tax
    Whether Registration of service tax can be refused ? Whether Service tax authorities can issue regis...
    Show AI Summary
    Registration refusal prohibited: complete service tax applications must be accepted and authorities cannot register suo moto.
    A complete and properly filled application in Form ST-1 and/or ST-2 must be accepted; there is no statutory power under the Finance Act, 1994 or the Service Tax Rules, 1994 for the Superintendent or the Commissioner to refuse registration, nor to grant registration suo moto. Registration is confined to the category specified in the application, and non-alignment with the correct category may attract recovery or penal proceedings.
    ManualsService Tax
    Is it mandatory to surrender/ cancel the registration certificate after ceasing to provide taxable s...
    Show AI Summary
    Surrender of service tax registration required on cessation of taxable services; cancellation follows after dues are cleared and documents submitted.
    Surrender of the registration certificate is mandatory upon cessation of taxable services and must be submitted to the Superintendent, who ensures all dues are paid before cancelling registration. No prescribed format exists; a simple application is acceptable. A trade notice lists common reasons for surrender and requires an application and undertaking, copies of recent ST-3 returns (up to six), profit & loss accounts and balance sheets (up to three years) or income tax returns or bank statements if unavailable, and disclosure of pending show-cause notices, confirmed demands, court cases and audits; waiver of penalty may be applied where returns were not filed but turnover is below the exemption limit.

    TMI Notes

    Back

    All TMI Notes

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      TMI Notes

      Home› TMI Notes › Indian Laws › Case-Laws › Category › This
      Back

      All TMI Notes

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters
      Indian Laws

      Ensuring Fair Procedure before declaring Fraud in Bank Loan: Providing Relevant Documents and Opportunity to be Heard

      10 August, 2024

      Contents
      Acts
      Plus +
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      Print Options

      Deciphering Legal Judgments: A Comprehensive Analysis of Case Law

      Reported as:

      2024 (5) TMI 1323 - DELHI HIGH COURT

      Introduction

      The judgement under analysis pertains to a writ petition filed by an ex-director and guarantor of a company (hereinafter referred to as "the Petitioner") against various banks (hereinafter referred to as "the Respondents"). The Petitioner challenged the Show Cause Notices (SCNs) issued by the Respondents for declaring the account of the company as 'Fraud'. The crux of the matter revolved around the alleged non-compliance with the agreed terms of the loan documents and various irregularities in the loan account, leading to suspicion of fraudulent activities.

      Arguments Presented

      Petitioner's Arguments

      The Petitioner contended that the SCNs were issued without providing the requisite documents, which formed the basis of the allegations. The Petitioner argued that the absence of such documents rendered it impossible to submit a proper reply to the SCNs. The Petitioner highlighted the following key points:

      Respondents' Arguments

      The Respondents contended that the requisite documents had already been provided to the Petitioner. The lead bank, State Bank of India (SBI), submitted that it was ready to grant an inspection of the company's records available with it. Additionally, the Respondents argued that:

      • No final decision had been taken by the banks, and only SCNs had been issued at this stage.
      • The judgments relied upon by the Petitioner were not applicable to the present case, and they did not provide for granting a personal hearing to the Petitioner.
      • The Respondents relied on the Supreme Court's order in Rajesh Agarwal's case to contend that granting a personal hearing by the banks was not mandatory.

      Discussions and Findings of the Court

      The Court discussed the settled principles of law regarding the applicability of the Principles of Natural Justice and the requirement to provide relevant documents forming the basis of a SCN. The Court relied on the Supreme Court judgments in Kanwar Natwar Singh & Kanwar Jagat Singh Versus Directorate of Enforcement - 2010 (10) TMI 156 - Supreme Court and T. Takano v. Securities and Exchange Board of India to emphasize the importance of disclosing relevant materials to enable an effective reply.

      The Court also referred to the Supreme Court's decision in State Bank of India v. Rajesh Agarwal, which held that the classification of an account as 'Fraud' under the Reserve Bank of India's Master Directions on Frauds leads to a credit freeze for the borrower. Consequently, the Principles of Natural Justice must be followed, and the borrower should be given an opportunity to be heard before classifying the account as fraud.

      Analysis and Decision by the Court

      The Court acknowledged that fair procedure and the Principles of Natural Justice require the provision of requisite documents forming the basis of a SCN to enable the concerned party to submit a proper reply. Failure to provide relevant documents would render the entire procedure of issuing a SCN and filing a reply an empty formality.

      The Court emphasized that the relevant documents forming the basis of the SCN must be provided to the concerned party to enable them to raise an effective defense. Denying this fundamental right by not providing the requisite documents would violate the Principles of Natural Justice.

      Considering the submissions made by the lead bank (SBI) and the Petitioner's counsel regarding the availability of the company's records with the RP, the Court issued the following directions:

      1. The Petitioner and/or his authorized representative shall be allowed to inspect the records of the company available with SBI (the lead bank).
      2. The Petitioner and/or his authorized representative shall also be allowed to inspect the records of the company available with the RP.
      3. Upon inspection, the Petitioner shall state the specific documents required from the company's records that form the basis of the SCNs. These documents shall be provided to the Petitioner.
      4. The cost of providing copies of the relevant documents shall be borne by the Petitioner.
      5. The process of inspection, stating the specific documents, and providing the relevant documents shall be completed within specified timelines.
      6. Upon receipt of the documents, the Petitioner shall file a reply to the respective SCNs within a specified timeline.
      7. The Petitioner is at liberty to request a personal hearing from the respective banks, which shall be considered accordingly.

      The Court disposed of the writ petition in terms of the aforesaid directions.

      Doctrine or Principle Discussed

      The primary doctrine discussed in the judgement is the Principles of Natural Justice, specifically the principle of audi alteram partem (hear the other side). The Court emphasized the importance of providing relevant documents and an opportunity to be heard before taking an adverse decision against a party.

      Comprehensive Summary

      The judgement dealt with a writ petition challenging Show Cause Notices (SCNs) issued by various banks for declaring the account of a company as 'Fraud'. The primary issue was the alleged non-compliance with the agreed terms of the loan documents and various irregularities in the loan account, leading to suspicion of fraudulent activities.

      The Petitioner, an ex-director and guarantor of the company, argued that the SCNs were issued without providing the requisite documents forming the basis of the allegations. The Petitioner contended that the absence of such documents rendered it impossible to submit a proper reply, violating the Principles of Natural Justice.

      The Court discussed the settled principles of law regarding the applicability of the Principles of Natural Justice and the requirement to provide relevant documents forming the basis of a SCN. The Court relied on various Supreme Court judgments, including T. Takano v. Securities and Exchange Board of India and State Bank of India v. Rajesh Agarwal, to emphasize the importance of disclosing relevant materials and providing an opportunity to be heard before taking an adverse decision.

      The Court acknowledged that fair procedure and the Principles of Natural Justice require the provision of requisite documents forming the basis of a SCN to enable the concerned party to submit a proper reply. Failure to provide relevant documents would render the entire procedure an empty formality.

      Considering the submissions made by the lead bank (SBI) and the Petitioner's counsel regarding the availability of the company's records with the Resolution Professional (RP), the Court issued directions for the Petitioner and/or his authorized representative to inspect the records of the company available with SBI and the RP. The Petitioner was directed to state the specific documents required from the company's records that formed the basis of the SCNs, and these documents were to be provided to the Petitioner within specified timelines.

      The Court also directed that upon receipt of the documents, the Petitioner shall file a reply to the respective SCNs within a specified timeline. Additionally, the Petitioner was granted the liberty to request a personal hearing from the respective banks, which shall be considered accordingly.

      The Court disposed of the writ petition in terms of the aforesaid directions, upholding the Principles of Natural Justice and the right to access relevant documents and be heard before an adverse decision is taken.

       

       

      Full Text:

      2024 (5) TMI 1323 - DELHI HIGH COURT

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax
      Next ➔