1978 (12) TMI 57

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Long after the completion of the original assessment for the year, the ITO came to notice from certain slips of paper found in the course of a raid in the premises of M/s. Madhusudan Gordhandas & Co., that the assessee had advanced loan of Rs. 50,000 to M/s. Madhusudan Gordhandas & Co. on 27th Feb., 1974. The entry was admittedly not there in the books of the assessee. In the circumstances, the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ertain entries in the name of the assessee, clearly showed that the assessee had advanced a sum of Rs. 50,000 to M/s. Madhusudan Gordhandas & Co., on 27th Feb.,1964 and since the assessee's books as produced before the ITO in the course of original assessment proceedings did not show original assessment proceedings did not show any such advance, he contended that the information reasonably led to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....er which action was already barred by limitation. He also stated that there was no credit or debit entry in the books of the assessee and the entry required to be considered under s. 69 and not under s. 68. Reliance in this behalf was placed on the Supreme Court's decisions in the cases of Calcutta Discount Co. Ltd. vs. ITO(1) and CT vs Onkarmal Meghraj (HUF)(2) and Calcutta and Punjab High Courts....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....lly advanced a sum of Rs. 50,000 to M/s. Madhusudan Gordhandas & Co. In any event, it is still more difficult to say in view of the fact that on the same day there is a receipt of Rs. 52,000 that the advance, if any, is not properly and satisfactorily explained. In this view of the matter it is held that the addition of Rs. 50,000, which has to be made, if at all, under s. 69 of the IT Act, is not....