TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Appeal Allowed: Tribunal Overturns Income Tax Additions</h1> <h3>MANILAL KILABHAI & CO. Versus THIRD INCOME TAX OFFICER.</h3> The Appellate Tribunal allowed the appeal by a registered firm, overturning the additions made by the Income Tax Officer (ITO) and the Appellate Assistant ... - Issues: Reopening of assessment under s. 147(a) | Justification of additions made by ITO and AAC | Application of s. 69 of the IT Act | Validity of proceedings under s. 147(a)Analysis:The case involves an appeal by a registered firm concerning its assessment for the assessment year 1964-65. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) reopened the assessment under s. 147(a) based on information obtained during a raid, adding a loan amount of Rs. 50,000 as the firm's income and Rs. 4,000 as estimated interest. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC) upheld the additions. The firm contended that the reopening of assessment was illegal and the additions were unjustified, while the Departmental Representative supported the ITO and AAC decisions. The firm argued that the information leading to the reopening should have been considered under s. 147(b) due to limitations, and the entries should be analyzed under s. 69, citing relevant court decisions.Upon review, the Appellate Tribunal observed discrepancies in the evidence found during the raid, indicating a reciprocal transaction between the firm and another entity. The Tribunal noted that the entries did not conclusively prove the loan transaction, especially considering the reciprocal nature of the dealings. Consequently, the Tribunal concluded that the addition of Rs. 50,000 under s. 69 of the IT Act was not justified, leading to the deletion of both the principal amount and the estimated interest. As a result, the Tribunal did not delve into the validity of the proceedings under s. 147(a), as the additions were deemed unwarranted.In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the additions made by the ITO and AAC. The judgment highlights the importance of substantiated evidence and proper application of relevant sections of the IT Act in determining the legitimacy of income additions during assessments.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
