Just a moment...

Top
Help
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

1986 (3) TMI 96

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d on 31-3-1977. 3. The facts of the case, the assessee's contentions and the decision of the ITO thereon, could be gathered from the following relevant portion of the assessment order: "Assessee has shown only income from capital gain on sale of flat at Bombay. Assessee purchased a flat in Navjivan Co-operative Housing Society, Bombay for Rs. 7,700. Assessee was granted a loan of Rs. 11,000. The amount of Rs. 7,700 was paid by the assessee in instalments. The said flat was sold out in 1976 for Rs. 45,000. Assessee has claimed cost of flat at Rs. 22,000 which has been arrived at as under: Rs.   Initial contribution 7,700 Amount paid towards loan in monthly instalment 5,587 Interest of loan 6,476 Cost of fans & geysor 1,077 ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nt rebate and/or investment allowance is allowable on the interest etc. Since the expenses incurred by the appellant are for the acquisition of flat and for creating an asset, I am of the view that the ITO was not justified in rejecting the claim of the appellant. The ITO is directed to accept to adopt the cost of the flat as shown by the appellant." 5. Being aggrieved by the order of the AAC, the revenue has come up in appeal before the Tribunal. The learned representative for the department strongly supported the action of the ITO and urged that the order of the AAC should be reversed. According to him, neither the decision in the case of Challapalli Sugars Ltd. nor in the case of CIT v. Tensile Steel Ltd. [1976] 104 ITR 581 (Guj.) would....