<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (3) TMI 96 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55077</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in a tax appeal regarding the inclusion of interest paid on a loan in calculating capital gain. The Tribunal held that the interest paid on the loan should be considered in determining the &#039;cost of acquisition&#039; of the asset sold. Additionally, the Tribunal clarified the distinction between &#039;cost of improvement&#039; and &#039;cost of acquisition&#039; under the Income-tax Act, emphasizing that interest paid on borrowed capital for purchase should be part of &#039;the cost of acquisition.&#039; The case was remanded to the Income Tax Officer for further investigation, with the appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93540" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (3) TMI 96 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55077</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee in a tax appeal regarding the inclusion of interest paid on a loan in calculating capital gain. The Tribunal held that the interest paid on the loan should be considered in determining the &#039;cost of acquisition&#039; of the asset sold. Additionally, the Tribunal clarified the distinction between &#039;cost of improvement&#039; and &#039;cost of acquisition&#039; under the Income-tax Act, emphasizing that interest paid on borrowed capital for purchase should be part of &#039;the cost of acquisition.&#039; The case was remanded to the Income Tax Officer for further investigation, with the appeal allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=55077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>