Just a moment...

Report
FeedbackReport
Welcome to TaxTMI

We're migrating from taxmanagementindia.com to taxtmi.com and wish to make this transition convenient for you. We welcome your feedback and suggestions. Please report any errors you encounter so we can address them promptly.

Bars
Logo TaxTMI
>
×

By creating an account you can:

Feedback/Report an Error
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home /

2005 (6) TMI 184

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pondent : U.H. Jadhav, JDR Order T. Anjaneyulu, Member (J) 1. These appeals are filed against an Order dated 29-4-2004 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise (Appeals), Pune. 2. The issue involved in the case is as to whether as per the provisions of Rule 57AC(5)(a), the appellants are liable to pay the Central Excise duty on the scrap generated at their job worker's end (while proc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nerated. The said scrap is of two types i.e. - (a) Recoverable scrap; and (b) Non-recoverable scrap. The recoverable scrap can be collected and can be sold in the market at some price. However, the non-recoverable scrap is nothing but dust/very fine particles of metal, which is not collectable and hence cannot be sold in the market. 5. The appellants are always clearing the recoverable scrap....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vered from the appellants under the provisions of Rule 57-I as amended by Rule 57AH of the Central Excise Rules, 1999 and Rules 12 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2001, read with Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. (ii) Interest under Section 11AB of the Act should not be recovered from the appellants; and (iii) Penalty equal to the duty determined should not be imposed upon the appell....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ordingly, the amount was deposited. 10. The Commissioner (Appeals) after hearing the parties upheld the Order-in-Original. Hence this appeal. 11. The appellants contend that the Commissioner (Appeals) failed to appreciate the vital fact that nowhere in Rule 57AC(5)(a)/Rule 4(5)(a) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, there is any provision made to compel the principal manufacturer to bring back the scrap....