<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 184 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54521</link>
    <description>Waste and scrap generated at a job worker&#039;s premises were held not to attract central excise duty on the principal manufacturer in the absence of a specific Cenvat Credit Rules provision requiring return of such scrap or deeming duty liability on the principal. The Tribunal applied its earlier view that scrap arising during manufacture is not dutiable merely because it remained with, and was sold by, the job worker. On the facts accepted, Section 3 of the Central Excise Act was not attracted, and the demand for duty, interest, and equal penalty was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 184 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54521</link>
      <description>Waste and scrap generated at a job worker&#039;s premises were held not to attract central excise duty on the principal manufacturer in the absence of a specific Cenvat Credit Rules provision requiring return of such scrap or deeming duty liability on the principal. The Tribunal applied its earlier view that scrap arising during manufacture is not dutiable merely because it remained with, and was sold by, the job worker. On the facts accepted, Section 3 of the Central Excise Act was not attracted, and the demand for duty, interest, and equal penalty was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>