Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2001 (9) TMI 187

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....per other two vessels were eligible for assessment at the rate applicable to the dredger under Accessories (Condition) Rules, 1963 read with Notification No. 133/87-Cus. 1.2. Subsequently, during the adjudication proceedings, the appellants contended before the Assistant Commissioner that the spares which had come along with the dredger covering under Bill of Entry dated 28-1-91 and in which no separate invoice had been raised by the supplier, should be assessed at the rate applicable to the dredger and the extra duty paid by them during provisional assessment, should be refunded to them, since the two conditions in terms of Accessories (Condition) Rules, 1963 read with Notification No. 133/97-Cus. have been fulfilled by them. 1.3. As regards accessories imported by them under other two different Bills of Entry, the appellants' contention was that the said spares/accessories were part of the dredger and as per the provisions of Accessories (Condition) Rules, 1963, the same have to be assessed at the rate applicable to the dredger. The said contention of the appellants was not accepted by the adjudicating authority who confirmed the demand of duty in respect of the spares/accessor....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....en specially designed to keep the floating pipeline away from the CSD Aquarius. (iii) Anchor pontoon "AP-1" :- The anchor pontoon AP-1 has been specially designed to position the floating pipeline behind the cutter suction Dredger Aquarius. Two anchors with buoys are delivered with the pontoon. (iv) Anchor Pontoon "AP-6" :- The anchor pontoon "AP-6" has been specially designed to position the floating pipeline behind the CSD Aquarius. Two anchors with buoys are delivered with the pontoon. (v) Elbow pontoon "EP-1" :- The elbow pontoon "EP-1" has been specially designed to make a 90-degrees bend in the floating pipeline and to position the floating pipeline behind the CSD AQUARIUS. Two anchors and two buoys are delivered with the pontoon. (vi) Shore connecting pontoon "CP-7" :- The shore connecting pontoon "CP-7" is a special pontoon to make the connection in between the floating and the shore pipelines. The pontoon is equipped with an A-frame to lift/lower the swivel pipe. (vii) Anchor handling pontoon "AP-7" :- This anchor handling pontoon "AP-7" within the centre a wall of 7.2 X 2.5 m. has been specially designed to lift heavy anchors from the sea bottom. (viii) Multi-Cat "D....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nts compulsorily supplied alongwith the article and under no separate charge, is chargeable to the same rate of duty as the main article. The word, "alongwith", does not mean "togetherwith" in the sense as is sought to be construed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals). If the connotation of the word, "alongwith" as given by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) is accepted, the very purpose of giving exemption to the accessories under the Accessories (Condition) Rules, 1963 would become redundant. As is evident from the description of various accessories etc. given by the appellants above, the accessories imported by the compulsory spares/accessories and the above accessories being integral and a very important part of the Cutter Suction Dredger, the Dredger cannot function in the absence of the aforesaid accessories. 2.3 He, further, submitted that in so far as filing of three separate Bills of Entry filed by the appellants is concerned, the appellants had to file three separate bills of entry since Dredger after working at Abu Dhabi came to Calcutta on its own steam since it was self-propelled work boat and other accessory equipments had to come from some other place by Vess....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ance upon the Tribunal's Order No. A-1436/CAL/97, dated 6-11-1997 [2001 (135) E.L.T. 1396 (Tribunal)] wherein all the accessories including the pipelines used for carrying out the dredged material to dumping place was held to be part of the Dredger, qualifying for their classification under Chapter 8905.00 as Dredger and they are entitled to the exemption Notification No. 133/87-Cus., dated 19-3-1987. Appeal against the above Order of the Tribunal filed by the Commissioner of Customs, Bhubaneswar, was dismissed by the Honourable Supreme Court, vide their Order dated 19-2-1999 [2002 (139) E.L.T. A313 (S.C.)]. As such, learned Advocate submits that the issue has been already decided by the Tribunal and confirmed by the Honourable Supreme Court and their appeal is entitled to be allowed. 3. Appearing for the Revenue, Shri R.N. Das, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Urmila Dutta, submitted that the earlier Order of the Tribunal was per incuriam inasmuch as the Accessories (Condition) Rules, 1963 were not considered. He drew our attention to the fact that the two appellants were assigned to two different works - one for dredging and the other for transportation of the dredged ma....