Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the pipelines, pontoons and other accessories imported separately for the cutter suction dredger were to be treated as part of the dredger and given the benefit of the applicable customs exemption.
Analysis: The imported equipment was found to be integral to the functioning of a cutter suction dredger, since such dredgers require suction and discharge pipelines and connected accessories for continuous dredging and disposal of dredged material. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision, which had held that these pipelines form an indispensable part of the dredger itself and therefore qualify for classification with the dredger for exemption purposes. That view had also been affirmed by the Supreme Court in the connected matter.
Conclusion: The accessories and pipelines were held to be part of the dredger and eligible for the exemption claimed.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: Where equipment is indispensable to the operation of a cutter suction dredger and forms part of its continuous dredging and discharge mechanism, it is to be treated as part of the dredger for customs exemption purposes.