Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2026 (3) TMI 157

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ra, Ms. Mrinalini Tandon, Ms. Kashis T, Advocates for SBI, Mr. Anoop Prakash Awasthi, Advocate for ARCIL, Mr. Azel Aekram, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Ravi Bansal, Mr. Devvart Rana, Advocates for IRP, Mr. Rishi Kapoor, Advocate for CD Mr. Devvart Rana, Advocate for IRP ORDER I.A. No. 207 of 2026 Heard Ld. Counsel for Applicant and Ld. Counsel appearing for Respondent No. 1. 2. This is an Application praying for condonation of 14 days delay in filing the Appeal. The ground given in the Application is that after coming to know about the imposition of cost of Rs. 5,00,000/- by the Adjudicating Authority by order dated 30/10/2025, Bank had referred the matter to the Headquarters in Delhi in first week of November, thereafter afte....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... to give the benefit of Section 18 of the Limitation Act. It is submitted that the Adjudicating Authority has not adverted to the question of Limitation on the basis of the material on the record. 2. Submission needs scrutiny. 3. Issue Notice. 4. Let Reply be filed within three weeks. Rejoinder be filed within further two weeks. 5. List this Appeal on 27th January, In the meanwhile, IRP shall proceed to collate the claim but shall not constitute the CoC." 3. The CD, after the aforesaid interim order proceeded with offer of settlement with Punjab National Bank and there being State Bank of India and another financial creditors, the Corporate Debtor, also proceeded and obtained OTS from the Banks and the....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n to impose cost against the Appellant has come up with this Appeal. 6. It is submitted that in view of the interim order, the Committee of Creditors (COC) was not constituted and the Financial Creditors were fully entitled to enter into the OTS with CD, which was entered, and thereafter 12(A) Application was filed by the Punjab National Bank, who has filed Section 7 Application, in which order is passed. 7. It is submitted that observations made by the Adjudicating Authority in Paragraph 14 & 15, that other creditors were not afforded opportunity and that payment shall be effectively a preferential payment, are uncalled for. 8. No other claimant has filed any Application objecting the 12(A) Application, hence those observations we....