<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 157 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787402</link>
    <description>Imposition of costs on financial creditors arising from a withdrawal under insolvency withdrawal provisions requires a reasoned, record-based finding establishing either that the withdrawal should have been disallowed or that creditors engaged in sanctionable misconduct; absent such findings and absent recorded objections by other creditors, imposing a monetary penalty is unsustainable. The tribunal confined review to the stated reasons for cost imposition, found none adequate, and therefore set aside the part of the order directing costs against the financial creditors, quashing that penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 08:41:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=888983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 157 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787402</link>
      <description>Imposition of costs on financial creditors arising from a withdrawal under insolvency withdrawal provisions requires a reasoned, record-based finding establishing either that the withdrawal should have been disallowed or that creditors engaged in sanctionable misconduct; absent such findings and absent recorded objections by other creditors, imposing a monetary penalty is unsustainable. The tribunal confined review to the stated reasons for cost imposition, found none adequate, and therefore set aside the part of the order directing costs against the financial creditors, quashing that penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=787402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>