Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (12) TMI 1111

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....come Tax Appellate Tribunal (in short 'ITAT'/'Tribunal') dated 12.09.2008 for the block period 01.04.1996 to 27.06.2002 passed in terms of the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short 'Act'). 2. Five questions were raised by the assessee originally and three were rejected even at the time of admission. Two were admitted for consideration and read as follows: 'c. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in holding that the assess has not maintained proper books of accounts and not complied with the provisions of section 9(b) ? d. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is right in law in holding that the loss claimed by the a....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....y, who was of the view that the appellant was entitled to a set-off of the loss as against the theatre collections for that year, based on the evidences produced before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) (in short 'CIT(A)'). Essentially, the CIT(A) has gone on the basis of the bank statements, concluding that such statements would suffice even in the absence of the books of accounts. The CIT(A) had arrived at the tabulation of the net loss in the following manner: Particulars Amount Amount By theatre collections 1,28,730.00   to picture outright and lease paid   7,25,000.00 to publicity expenses   14,275.00 To representative salaries   6,500.00 To printing and station....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....goric to the effect that the computation of income in order to arrive at the income earned by a film distribution company, must be based on its books of accounts. 10. For ready reference, we extract below the provisions of Rule 9B, to the extent to which it is relevant for this matter: 'Deduction in respect of expenditure on acquisition of distribution rights of feature films. 9B. (1) In computing the profits and gains of the business of distribution of feature films carried on by a person (the person carrying on such business hereafter in this rule referred to as film distributor), the deduction in respect of the cost of acquisition of a feature film shall be allowed in accordance with sub-rule (2) to sub-rule (4). ....