<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1111 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783571</link>
    <description>Deduction and computation of profits from the business of feature film distribution under IT Rules r.9B turned on whether income could be computed without maintained books of account. The HC held that r.9B(5) mandates computation based on the assessee&#039;s books, and the conditions in r.9B(5)(a)(i)-(iii) operate subject to compliance with the requirement to maintain such books. Where the assessee admittedly failed to maintain books, the authority cannot compute income on alternative evidences; such material may only supplement, not substitute, books of account. The Revenue&#039;s interpretation prevailed, and the claim was rejected in the Revenue&#039;s favour.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 08:01:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=872354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1111 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783571</link>
      <description>Deduction and computation of profits from the business of feature film distribution under IT Rules r.9B turned on whether income could be computed without maintained books of account. The HC held that r.9B(5) mandates computation based on the assessee&#039;s books, and the conditions in r.9B(5)(a)(i)-(iii) operate subject to compliance with the requirement to maintain such books. Where the assessee admittedly failed to maintain books, the authority cannot compute income on alternative evidences; such material may only supplement, not substitute, books of account. The Revenue&#039;s interpretation prevailed, and the claim was rejected in the Revenue&#039;s favour.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=783571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>