2025 (12) TMI 358
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Senior Advocate with Shri Vaibhav Bhagwat, learned counsel For the Respondent : Shri Vishwajit Joshi, Additional Advocate General ORDER This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by the petitioner challenging the notice dated 24.10.2025 (Annexure P-1) issued to him by the Collector District Indore, respondent No. 2. 2. As per the petitioner, in 188....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....that the land was given by the then Holkar State to the Canadian mission hence, the question of Mission being Government lessee does not even arise. Even, in case of breach of condition, the land will revert back to the Maharani or her successors and not to the State Government since State of Madhya Pradesh is not the successor of land belonging to the late Maharani. In the show cause notice findi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....de, 1959. The same is certainly a show cause notice only and though reasons have been recorded therein as to why the same is being issued it cannot be said that any finding whatsoever has been recorded in respect of the title or ownership of the property as has been contented by the petitioner. For the sake of clarification, it is observed that any observations made in the impugned show cause noti....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e State Government and has reverted to the Maharani or her successors then there is no reason as to why such submissions should not be made before the Collector. The land was initially given to the Canadian mission. What would be the effect of the grant in favour of the Canadian mission would also be required to be considered. The flow of title of the property is not an admitted fact. It has to be....




TaxTMI
TaxTMI