<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 358 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782818</link>
    <description>A show cause notice calling for inquiry into the nature and title of land was treated as a preliminary notice only, because it recorded no final finding on title, ownership, or reversion. The writ challenge was premature since the petitioner had been asked to place its stand before the Collector, and the disputed questions required determination in the pending proceedings by the issuing authority first. Interference with the notice was therefore declined and the petition was not entertained on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 16:03:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=869390" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 358 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782818</link>
      <description>A show cause notice calling for inquiry into the nature and title of land was treated as a preliminary notice only, because it recorded no final finding on title, ownership, or reversion. The writ challenge was premature since the petitioner had been asked to place its stand before the Collector, and the disputed questions required determination in the pending proceedings by the issuing authority first. Interference with the notice was therefore declined and the petition was not entertained on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=782818</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>