2007 (3) TMI 275
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....itioner has challenged the order dated 9-8-2001 passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, filed as Annexure A6 to the writ petition, whereby the Tribunal has declined to grant interim protection to the petitioner during the pendency of their reference before this Court. We have heard Shri A.P.Mathur, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Shri Subodh Kumar, l....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....stay is being sought for. The other ground on which the stay application has been rejected is that Section 35N of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") mandates the deposit of entire amount pursuant to the order passed by the Tribunal under sub-section (1) of Section 35C of the Act. 3. We have perused the stay application which was filed by the petitioners before t....
TaxTMI