https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48124 The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal's decision to deny interim protection during the reference before the High Court. The Tribunal's rejection was upheld as the petitioners failed to specify the amount for stay and demonstrate financial hardship in the application, as required by Section 35N of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The High Court clarified that the Tribunal has the authority to grant interim relief despite the provisions of Section 35N, as established in a previous judgment, leading to the affirmation of the Tribunal's decision. en-us Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Aug 2010 17:31:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48124 The High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal's decision to deny interim protection during the reference before the High Court. The Tribunal's rejection was upheld as the petitioners failed to specify the amount for stay and demonstrate financial hardship in the application, as required by Section 35N of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The High Court clarified that the Tribunal has the authority to grant interim relief despite the provisions of Section 35N, as established in a previous judgment, leading to the affirmation of the Tribunal's decision. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 09 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48124