Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (10) TMI 294

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Sr. DR ORDER PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM This assessee's appeal for assessment year 2013-14, arises against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2 [in short, the "CIT(A)"], New Delhi's order dated 18.08.2017 passed in case no. 10476/16-17, involving proceedings under section 147/143(3) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). 2. Case called twice. None ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....being the case, we are of the considered view that once the assessee's stand from the day one is that the impugned sum represents inter-corporate deposits, which has neither been rebutted by the Assessing Officer nor in the lower appellate discussions, case law CIT Vs. Subhkam Monetary Services (P.) Ltd., (2015) 54 taxmann.com 226 (Bombay) holds that such intercorporate deposits do not attract sec....