<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 294 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779498</link>
    <description>ITAT (Del) held that the impugned sum constituted inter-corporate deposits bearing interest and did not attract deeming under section 2(22)(e). Relying on the CBDT circular and higher court precedent, the tribunal found the assessee&#039;s characterization unrebutted by the AO or lower authorities, rejected the Revenue&#039;s addition, deleted the impugned assessment, and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2025 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=856666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 294 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779498</link>
      <description>ITAT (Del) held that the impugned sum constituted inter-corporate deposits bearing interest and did not attract deeming under section 2(22)(e). Relying on the CBDT circular and higher court precedent, the tribunal found the assessee&#039;s characterization unrebutted by the AO or lower authorities, rejected the Revenue&#039;s addition, deleted the impugned assessment, and allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>