2025 (9) TMI 1645

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Jitendra B. Mishra, a/w Ms. Sangeeta Yadav, Mr. Ashutoshn Mishra, Mr. Rupesh Dubey,. ORAL JUDGMENT   (PER M.S. SONAK, J):- 1. Heard Mr. Sridharan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. Leave is granted to amend this petition. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. Reverification is dispensed with. 3. Rule. The Rule is made re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ill of Entry No. 3879527 dated 14.08.2025 under the CTI 8517 1810 without payment of any duty and without executing any bond/guarantee;" 5. The petitioner seeks writ upon the Respondent No. 3 to assess and issue out of charge order and clear the goods under CTI 8517 1810. In the alternative, the petitioner seeks a writ to direct the Respondent No. 3 to provisionally assess the goods under the C....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) TMI 505-CESTAT Mumbai. He submitted that the importer's appeal against the said decision is dismissed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. He therefore submitted the relief as claimed for by the petitioner may not be granted. 8. Mr. Shridharan by way of rejoinder points out that the judgment and order of CESTAT dated 10th August 2023 specifically distinguishes the decision in Ingram Micro India (sup....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nreasonably. The rival contentions must be considered and a view one way or the other must be reached or at least provisionally reached within some reasonable time so that the importers know where they stand . 11. Accordingly, by keeping open the above rival contentions for the determination of the Respondent No. 3, we direct that the Respondent No. 3 to provisionally assess the imported goods ....