https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779156 The HC declined to grant a mandamus directing the authority to exercise its discretion in a specific manner, holding such relief inappropriate absent a compelling case, but emphasized that authorities must not unreasonably delay provisional assessment. The court directed Respondent No. 3 to provisionally assess the imported goods under bill of entry No. 3879527 dated 14 August 2025 expeditiously and, in any event, within four weeks of this order. The petition was disposed of. en-us Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Sep 2025 08:30:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779156 The HC declined to grant a mandamus directing the authority to exercise its discretion in a specific manner, holding such relief inappropriate absent a compelling case, but emphasized that authorities must not unreasonably delay provisional assessment. The court directed Respondent No. 3 to provisionally assess the imported goods under bill of entry No. 3879527 dated 14 August 2025 expeditiously and, in any event, within four weeks of this order. The petition was disposed of. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 22 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=779156