2004 (4) TMI 83

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... - This is an appeal preferred under Sec. 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944 by the appellant against an order, dated 27-11-2003 (Ann. 'I') passed by CESTAT in Appeal No. E/674/2003-B of 2000 which in turn arise out of an order passed by the Commissioner in Case No. 02/Comm./ Cex/Ind/2003, dated 23-1-2003. 2. The impugned order reads as under :- "The appellants filed this appeal against ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of the impugned order quoted supra. In other words the order impugned being self explanatory in itself it does not call for any interference in further appeal by this Court. We are completely in agreement with what is observed by the learned Member of the Tribunal while dismissing the appeal. 5. The short question that arose for consideration before the Tribunal at the instance of appella....