2004 (4) TMI 83

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Sec. 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944 by the appellant against an order, dated 27-11-2003 (Ann. 'I') passed by CESTAT in Appeal No. E/674/2003-B of 2000 which in turn arise out of an order passed by the Commissioner in Case No. 02/Comm./ Cex/Ind/2003, dated 23-1-2003. 2. The impugned order reads as under :- "The appellants filed this appeal against the adjudication order passed by the Comm....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....words the order impugned being self explanatory in itself it does not call for any interference in further appeal by this Court. We are completely in agreement with what is observed by the learned Member of the Tribunal while dismissing the appeal. 5. The short question that arose for consideration before the Tribunal at the instance of appellant was whether Commissioner, Central Excise was....