https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47018 The High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore dismissed the appellant's appeal under Sec. 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against CESTAT's order upholding the Commissioner of Central Excise's decision to forfeit the facility for depositing duty fortnightly. The Court found no merit in the appeal, stating that the appellant had no legal right to challenge the Commissioner's order at a later stage since it was not contested initially. The Tribunal and the High Court agreed that the appellant could not introduce new issues at this stage, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs. en-us Tue, 13 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 26 Jul 2010 13:57:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47018 The High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore dismissed the appellant's appeal under Sec. 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against CESTAT's order upholding the Commissioner of Central Excise's decision to forfeit the facility for depositing duty fortnightly. The Court found no merit in the appeal, stating that the appellant had no legal right to challenge the Commissioner's order at a later stage since it was not contested initially. The Tribunal and the High Court agreed that the appellant could not introduce new issues at this stage, leading to the dismissal of the appeal without costs. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 13 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=47018