2025 (3) TMI 1528
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... and Mr. Sumit Khadaria, Advocates. For the Respondents : Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, CGSC for R-1 and R-2. Mr. Sandeep Sethi and Mr. Pragyan Pradip Sharma, Senior Advocates with Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Mr. Nikhil Sharma and Mr. Hardik Jain, Advocates for R-3. ORDER 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of Indi....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....mitted by Respondent No. 3/Domestic Industry to DGTR under the Customs Tariff Act seeking imposition of ADD. 5. In terms of Rule 18 of the ADD Rules, the Central Government has to, within three months of the publication of the final findings, decide to impose ADD or take a decision otherwise. 6. Ms. Shiva Lakshmi, ld. CGSC appearing for the Government submits that the Central Government....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Del 11395 in this regard. 9. Heard. Even after considering Mr. V. Lakshmikumaran's submission, this Court is of the opinion that the present petition is premature. Irrespective of whether the Central Government accepts the recommendation for imposition of ADD or not, the said decision would be appealable either at the instance of the Petitioner or the domestic industry. Challenge being raised t....
TaxTMI