https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463958 A writ petition challenging the Designated Authority's final findings recommending anti-dumping duty was treated as premature because the Central Government had not yet decided whether to accept the recommendation and impose duty. The court noted that the appellate remedy under Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 would arise after the Government's decision, when the affected party could pursue the challenge in accordance with law. The petition was therefore disposed of at this stage, without adjudicating the merits of the anti-dumping recommendation. en-us Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Sep 2025 20:44:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463958 A writ petition challenging the Designated Authority's final findings recommending anti-dumping duty was treated as premature because the Central Government had not yet decided whether to accept the recommendation and impose duty. The court noted that the appellate remedy under Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 would arise after the Government's decision, when the affected party could pursue the challenge in accordance with law. The petition was therefore disposed of at this stage, without adjudicating the merits of the anti-dumping recommendation. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 28 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=463958