2025 (9) TMI 74

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Petitioner : Mr.S.Ganesh Aravindh For the Respondents : Mr.Sai Srujan Tayi, Senior Standing Counsel ORDER This writ petition has been filed, challenging the order dated 24.03.2025 passed by the first respondent in Appeal Seaport.C.Cus.II No.360/2025. 2.The petitioner is aggrieved by the wrong classification of the petitioner's imported goods under the Customs Tariff Act. The peti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tioner's contention, they have filed the following orders passed both by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) as well as by the CESTAT: a) Order-in-Appeal No.33-35 (Gr.V)/2023 (JNCH)/Appeals dated 31.01.2023 passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Mumbai; b) Cloudwalker Streaming Technologies Pvt. Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs (NS.V), Raigad reported in 2022 (1) ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r the Customs Tariff Act. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner's contention. But, no prejudice would be caused to the respondents if such a direction is issued. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. 4. It is made clear that once an appeal is filed by the petitioner before the CESTAT, aggrieved by the impugned order dated 24.03.2025 ....