<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 74 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777585</link>
    <description>HC held the imported goods were correctly classifiable under CTI 8471 41 90 and that the impugned order erred in reclassifying them under CTI 8528 59 00 contrary to earlier orders of the Commissioner of Customs Appeals and CESTAT. The HC directed that the goods be treated as CTI 8471 41 90 when deciding the final orders in the petitioner&#039;s forthcoming statutory appeal and ordered the petitioner to file that appeal within two weeks of receiving this order. Petition disposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 08:01:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 74 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777585</link>
      <description>HC held the imported goods were correctly classifiable under CTI 8471 41 90 and that the impugned order erred in reclassifying them under CTI 8528 59 00 contrary to earlier orders of the Commissioner of Customs Appeals and CESTAT. The HC directed that the goods be treated as CTI 8471 41 90 when deciding the final orders in the petitioner&#039;s forthcoming statutory appeal and ordered the petitioner to file that appeal within two weeks of receiving this order. Petition disposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>