Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2025 (9) TMI 15

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ondent : None ORDER PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM: This is an appeal preferred by the Revenue against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, (hereinafter in short "the Ld.CIT(A)"), Delhi, dated 19.12.2023 for the Assessment Year (hereinafter in short "AY") 2014-15. 2. At the outset, it is noted that there is a delay of '139' days in filing of the appeal. And the AO....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vestments [sic]. Therefore, he asked the assessee 'as to why' provisions of Sec.14A of the Act should not be applied for disallowing the expenditure incurred for the purpose of earning the exempt income. In response, assessee furnished certain explanations which was not accepted by the AO who applied Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 (hereinafter in short 'the Rules') and made disallowance of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 6. In the meanwhile, the AO took note of the fact that in the Original Assessment Order passed on 23.12.2016, he has inadvertently taken note of the interest expenditure of Rs. 5,47,10,000/- instead of the correct figures of Rs. 45,31,72,192/-. According to the AO, since the mistake was apparent on record, he passed a rectification order u/s.154 of the Act dated 28.06.2017 and recomputed u/s.14A ....