<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 15 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777526</link>
    <description>ITAT (Chennai) upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of a disallowance under s.14A r.w.r.8D, finding the assessee did not earn exempt income for AY 2014-15; Revenue could not overturn that factual finding. The tribunal held the Finance Act, 2022 explanation to s.14A is prospective and inapplicable to AY 2014-15, so no disallowance was warranted. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2025 08:13:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=847144" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 15 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777526</link>
      <description>ITAT (Chennai) upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of a disallowance under s.14A r.w.r.8D, finding the assessee did not earn exempt income for AY 2014-15; Revenue could not overturn that factual finding. The tribunal held the Finance Act, 2022 explanation to s.14A is prospective and inapplicable to AY 2014-15, so no disallowance was warranted. Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=777526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>