2025 (7) TMI 833
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hruti D. Vyas, Addl. G.P. a/w Mr Aditya S. Deolekar, A.G.P.,. PC:- 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The Petitioner challenges the order dated 28 February 2025 made by the 3rd Respondent. 3. In paragraph 15, the Petitioner has made a bold averment that it has no other alternative or equally efficacious remedy than to approach this Court for the redressal of its grievance. This is ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....pugned order are wholly without jurisdiction. 5. In short, there is no justification for the Petitioner to bypass the alternative and efficacious remedy provided by the statute. This is a case where the Petitioner merely seeks to take a chance and avoid the pre-deposit, which is one of the statutory requirements for instituting an Appeal. 6. In Oberoi Constructions V/s. Union of India 2024 SCC O....