2025 (7) TMI 833

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....,. For the Respondent-State: Ms Shruti D. Vyas, Addl. G.P. a/w Mr Aditya S. Deolekar, A.G.P.,. PC:- 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The Petitioner challenges the order dated 28 February 2025 made by the 3rd Respondent. 3. In paragraph 15, the Petitioner has made a bold averment that it has no other alternative or equally efficacious remedy than to approach this Court fo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed show cause notice and consequently the impugned order are wholly without jurisdiction. 5. In short, there is no justification for the Petitioner to bypass the alternative and efficacious remedy provided by the statute. This is a case where the Petitioner merely seeks to take a chance and avoid the pre-deposit, which is one of the statutory requirements for instituting an Appeal. 6. In Obe....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....998 (8) SCC 1 are satisfied. 8. Accordingly, we dismiss this Petition. At this stage, the learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner will file an Appeal against the impugned order within four weeks from today. 9. Accordingly, we direct that if the Appeal is instituted within four weeks, then the Appellate Authority should decide the Appeal on merits without adverting to th....