https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774765 A writ petition challenging an adjudication order was refused where an efficacious statutory appeal was available and clearly specified in the order, including the appellate forum and limitation period. The Court held that allegations of limitation issues and bias required factual examination and did not show a complete lack of jurisdiction justifying writ intervention. It reiterated that extraordinary jurisdiction should not be used to bypass the statutory appellate process unless recognised exceptions are made out, and the petition was dismissed for want of justification to ignore the alternate remedy. en-us Tue, 01 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Jul 2025 08:36:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774765 A writ petition challenging an adjudication order was refused where an efficacious statutory appeal was available and clearly specified in the order, including the appellate forum and limitation period. The Court held that allegations of limitation issues and bias required factual examination and did not show a complete lack of jurisdiction justifying writ intervention. It reiterated that extraordinary jurisdiction should not be used to bypass the statutory appellate process unless recognised exceptions are made out, and the petition was dismissed for want of justification to ignore the alternate remedy. Case-Laws GST Tue, 01 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=774765