Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (7) TMI 543

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....se No.AC/EWI/C/JAIPUR/2025-26/3172 registered at State GST District Jaipur for the offence punishable under Section 132(1)(c) read with Section 132(1)(i) & 132(5) of the Rajasthan Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 03.04.2025 and charge-sheet has been filed in the matter on 30.05.2025. He further submits that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that maximum punishment which can be awarded is five years. He relied upon the order dated 28.04.2025 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Vineet Jain Vs. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....al witnesses and there is no possibility of influencing the witnesses during the course of the trial. He further submits that looking at the bulky charge-sheet, the trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose, so, the petitioner be released on bail. 5. Learned Additional Govt. Advocates have opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and submit that there is allegation against the petitioner for making of bogus supply. He further submits that tax evasion in the present case amounts to 9.54 Crores, therefore, the petitioner should not be enlarged on bail. 6. Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the material ava....