2025 (7) TMI 542
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....l at the admission stage itself. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, based on the voluntary request made by the petitioner, their GST Registration was cancelled in the year 2022. Subsequent to the said cancellation, all notices/communications were uploaded by the respondent under the "View Additional Notices and Orders" column in the GST common portal. Since the petitioner was not aware of the said notices, they failed to file their reply within the time. Under these circumstances, the impugned order came to be passed by the respondent without providing any opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner. Hence, this petition has been filed. 4. Further, he would submit that the petitioner is willing....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ls contained in the show cause notice. 8. No doubt, sending notice by uploading in portal is a sufficient service, but, the Officer who is sending the repeated reminders, inspite of the fact that no response from the petitioner to the show cause notices etc., the Officer should have applied his/her mind and explored the possibility of sending notices by way of other modes prescribed in Section 169 of the GST Act, which are also the valid mode of service under the Act, otherwise it will not be an effective service, rather, it would only fulfilling the empty formalities. Merely passing an ex-parte order by fulfilling the empty formalities will not serve any useful purpose and the same will only pave way for multiplicity of litigations, not o....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI